<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Diabetes Talking &#187; Diabetes Cure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://diabetestalking.com</link>
	<description>Talking and Discussing Diabetes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:47:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Business for u</title>
		<link>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/business-for-u-1742764.html</link>
		<comments>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/business-for-u-1742764.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diabetes Cure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diabetestalking.com/uncategorized/business-for-u-1742764.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
I am a businessman&#44; herb product manufacturer n trading. This herb product  Jiang Xie Ning ( JXN ) cure stroke&#44; diabetes&#44; hypertension n high  cholesterol.  Now only need ONE master dealer each country to run this MONOPOLY  business.My company website www.yongjian-herb.com / www.yongjian.biz 

Response:
  Now only need ONE master dealer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>I am a businessman&#44; herb product manufacturer n trading. This herb product  Jiang Xie Ning ( JXN ) cure stroke&#44; diabetes&#44; hypertension n high  cholesterol.  Now only need ONE master dealer each country to run this MONOPOLY  business.My company website www.yongjian-herb.com / www.yongjian.biz </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  Now only need ONE master dealer each country to run this MONOPOLY   business.My company website www. </p>
<p>How about a masterbater?  &#8212;  To reply by email&#44; remove the word &quot;space&quot; </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/business-for-u-1742764.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kerry and the Gay Issue</title>
		<link>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/kerry-and-the-gay-issue-1200670.html</link>
		<comments>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/kerry-and-the-gay-issue-1200670.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diabetes Cure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diabetestalking.com/uncategorized/kerry-and-the-gay-issue-1200670.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; One interesting aspect of the last Kerry-Bush debate was his response   on the gay issue.   Now I happen to think&#44; that in least in terms of the big picture   issues&#44; there is little to choose between Kerry and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; One interesting aspect of the last Kerry-Bush debate was his response   on the gay issue.   Now I happen to think&#44; that in least in terms of the big picture   issues&#44; there is little to choose between Kerry and Bush. They think   much the same thing about most everything. I don&#8217;t think there has yet   been a debate in which Kerry has not used the phrase &quot;the President   and I agree on &#8230;&quot; or words to that effect. In one of the debates he   used variations of that phrase three times.   But on the gay issue&#44; there does seem to be a difference&#44; and I&#8217;m   wondering if Kerry&#8217;s view represents the liberal consensus in America.   Kerry implied that Cheney&#8217;s daughter had no choice about being a   lesbian&#44; whereas Bush says he&#8217;s not sure whether it&#8217;s a choice or not.   Curiously for me&#44; I think I&#8217;d have given Bush&#8217;s answer&#44; rather than   Kerry&#8217;s.   I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s at all clear why some people are sexually oriented   to people of their own gender. To the best of my knowledge there are   no studies that clearly show a &quot;gay chromosome&quot; </p>
<p>Well just today it has become clear that there is a chromosome that causes  gays.  The research concentrating on why and how gay people still exist as it seems  fairly clear under the normal scheme of things same sex people would reduce  brcause of no offspring&#44; and should by now have disappeared or be of a very  small number?  But the research indicates that the gene is connected with fecundity and  families of gay people &#44; apparently the straight members&#44; have the same gene  which is the cause of the increased fecundity.  or that can analyse  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; environment in such a way as to reliably predict homosexual   orientation. And so&#44; on empirical grounds&#44; what other answer can one   give but that one is not sure?   For me&#44; that doesn&#8217;t justify discrimination in any sphere of human   activity. Whether it&#8217;s a lifestyle choice or predicted by genes or any   combination of free will or predisposition is surely irrelevant. In my   view&#44; what consenting adults choose to do sexually is simply no   business of the state&#44; and attempts to vary legal protections   according to gender&#44; or to mitigate a person&#8217;s claims or rights on the   basis of sexual orientation are indefencible. If gay people want to   get married&#44; I say&#44; let them do so. Ironically&#44; gays may turn out to   be one of the last bastions of marriage.   Now I can understand why the notion that gays have no choice in the   matter appeals to those who oppose discrimination. Plainly&#44; if it&#8217;s   like skin colour or ethnicity or genetic disability&#44; then programs to   &quot;cure&quot; it are doomed to failure and will inflict pain without good   purpose. Fears about young people being turned gay by adult gays would   be groundless. Discriminating against people in areas for which they   aren&#8217;t accountable seems clearly wrong.   On the other hand&#44; it does make homosexuality seem a little like a   disease. Perhaps&#44; eventually&#44; if one can isolate the gay gene&#44; one can   modify the sexuality of gays. If it&#8217;s environmental&#44; perhaps people   can sue those responsible for (unwittingly) turning them gay. Public   policies against &quot;those damn culottes&quot; might have to be instituted. In   the end&#44; gays might come to be bracketed closely with disabled and HIV   positive people &#8212; seen as victims who ought to prefer a cure.   I rather suspect that nobody is purely heterosexual. After all&#44; what   is a homosexual anyway? It is someone who aims to engage in sexual   contact with persons of their own gender. There is ample evidence that   many men who are married with children also engage in a range of   sexual practices with other men&#44; while asserting that they are   heterosexual. In prison&#44; many men satisfy themselves in ways that they   would publicly declaim on the outside. In the end&#44; in my opinion&#44; we   aren&#8217;t oriented to genders&#44; but to people and circumstances. It may   well be that a given man or woman may never find him- or herself in a   situation in which a same-sex experience seems indicated. That person   may believe he or she is heterosxual and in practice&#44; he or she will   be so defined. But if they do find themselves in that situation and   decide to go ahead&#44; does that mean that&#44; retrospectively&#44; they were   gay or bisexual?   I think such definitions are pointless. Speaking for myself&#44; I cannot   imagine any set of circumstances in which I would find sex with   another male appealing. But not being able to imagine such   circumstances&#44; and there being no such circumstances are not at all   the same thing. Perhaps if people just stopped worrying about who   people were oriented to and left people to try floating their boats   down whatever river seemed inviting at the time there would be a lot   less rubbish being talked.   I know that&#8217;s not Bush&#8217;s position of course&#44; but that doesn&#8217;t mean   Kerry is right either. I think it speaks volumes about the US polity   that even on this matter&#44; neither side is willing to unconditionally   endorse the full sexual rights of gay people&#44; and those that wink at   them have to find an entirely spurious basis for doing so.   The Nerk </p>
<p>As far as I am aware the gays do not want amrriage so much as a recognition  of their relationships in some legal manner.  And although I agree that it is not a marriage because children will not  occur.  Their should be some sort of legal arrangement for the following reasons.  It becomes clear that it is a requirement as we all know only relatives can  visit in hospitals&#44; and if a gay couple have an accident the partner might  be stopped from even comforting their partner because of being unable to  produce any legal attachment?  And I can understand that some legal recogition of the relationship so that  if one dies&#44; the money and/or &nbsp;property wont go to an underserving aunt&#44;  brother or parent leaving the partner destitute? </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>- Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; One interesting aspect of the last Kerry-Bush debate was his response  on the gay issue.  Now I happen to think&#44; that in least in terms of the big picture  issues&#44; there is little to choose between Kerry and Bush. They think  much the same thing about most everything. I don&#8217;t think there has yet  been a debate in which Kerry has not used the phrase &quot;the President  and I agree on &#8230;&quot; or words to that effect. In one of the debates he  used variations of that phrase three times.  But on the gay issue&#44; there does seem to be a difference&#44; and I&#8217;m  wondering if Kerry&#8217;s view represents the liberal consensus in America.  Kerry implied that Cheney&#8217;s daughter had no choice about being a  lesbian&#44; whereas Bush says he&#8217;s not sure whether it&#8217;s a choice or not.  Curiously for me&#44; I think I&#8217;d have given Bush&#8217;s answer&#44; rather than  Kerry&#8217;s.  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s at all clear why some people are sexually oriented  to people of their own gender. To the best of my knowledge there are  no studies that clearly show a &quot;gay chromosome&quot;   Well just today it has become clear that there is a chromosome that causes   gays.   The research concentrating on why and how gay people still exist as it seems   fairly clear under the normal scheme of things same sex people would reduce   brcause of no offspring&#44; and should by now have disappeared or be of a very   small number?   But the research indicates that the gene is connected with fecundity and   families of gay people &#44; apparently the straight members&#44; have the same gene   which is the cause of the increased fecundity. </p>
<p>&nbsp; &nbsp;Pointers ? I somehow doubt this&#8230; and I support Gay marriage.  &nbsp; &nbsp;I have seen conclusive work on Brain differences&#44; but it remained  a &quot;chicken or egg&quot; argument&#8230;. &nbsp;it may well be hormonal&#44;  which may even be environmentally related&#44; we aren&#8217;t sure.  &nbsp; &nbsp;Gay marriage reduces promiscuity&#44; thus transmission of STD&#8217;s  &nbsp; are inhibited&#8230;  &nbsp; &nbsp;In addition&#44; Marriage forces one to develop a deeper sense of  relationship&#8230;. and work on things&#44; rather than turn and run.  Another good thing&#8230;.  &nbsp; The problem with Gay marriage is the inheritance rights&#44; and  a couple other issue&#8217;s&#8230; most of which are about the children.  &nbsp; Children are our future.  &nbsp; Most of our laws surrounding marriage are there to facilitate  the lives of our children. A Society can know no greater calling&#8230;  &nbsp; And &#44; it is a phony straw man to assume that a gay marriage  would not produce a better role model for children.. it would.  &nbsp; If the parent was gay&#44; that isn&#8217;t going to change. It is  better the child learns the value of fidelity&#44; and sticking  together through thick and thin&#44; rather than a rotating  &quot;other half&quot; on a daily basis.  &nbsp; The child will emulate role model behavior&#44; as far as promiscuity  goes&#8230; but&#44; choice of gender appears to be determined by something  other than role.  &nbsp; &nbsp;But&#44; another concern regarding children is the passing of  the money&#8230;  &nbsp; As it stands today&#44; Uncle &quot;Ernie&quot;&#44; passes on&#44; and the estate  passes back to the family&#44; who in straw man theory&#44; is reproducing&#8230;  &nbsp; Thus&#44; lack of marriage among gays&#44; facilitates our children.  &nbsp; Thus&#44; I suspect&#44; the position among the Kerry group.  &nbsp; &nbsp; They support Unions being recognized&#44; but they don&#8217;t want it to be a  legal marriage.  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; or that can analyse  environment in such a way as to reliably predict homosexual  orientation. And so&#44; on empirical grounds&#44; what other answer can one  give but that one is not sure?  For me&#44; that doesn&#8217;t justify discrimination in any sphere of human  activity. Whether it&#8217;s a lifestyle choice or predicted by genes or any  combination of free will or predisposition is surely irrelevant. In my  view&#44; what consenting adults choose to do sexually is simply no  business of the state&#44; and attempts to vary legal protections  according to gender&#44; or to mitigate a person&#8217;s claims or rights on the  basis of sexual orientation are indefencible. If gay people want to  get married&#44; I say&#44; let them do so. Ironically&#44; gays may turn out to  be one of the last bastions of marriage.  Now I can understand why the notion that gays have no choice in the  matter appeals to those who oppose discrimination. Plainly&#44; if it&#8217;s  like skin colour or ethnicity or genetic disability&#44; then programs to  &quot;cure&quot; it are doomed to failure and will inflict pain without good  purpose. Fears about young people being turned gay by adult gays would  be groundless. Discriminating against people in areas for which they  aren&#8217;t accountable seems clearly wrong.  On the other hand&#44; it does make homosexuality seem a little like a  disease. Perhaps&#44; eventually&#44; if one can isolate the gay gene&#44; one can  modify the sexuality of gays. If it&#8217;s environmental&#44; perhaps people  can sue those responsible for (unwittingly) turning them gay. Public  policies against &quot;those damn culottes&quot; might have to be instituted. In  the end&#44; gays might come to be bracketed closely with disabled and HIV  positive people &#8212; seen as victims who ought to prefer a cure.  I rather suspect that nobody is purely heterosexual. After all&#44; what  is a homosexual anyway? It is someone who aims to engage in sexual  contact with persons of their own gender. There is ample evidence that  many men who are married with children also engage in a range of  sexual practices with other men&#44; while asserting that they are  heterosexual. In prison&#44; many men satisfy themselves in ways that they  would publicly declaim on the outside. In the end&#44; in my opinion&#44; we  aren&#8217;t oriented to genders&#44; but to people and circumstances. It may  well be that a given man or woman may never find him- or herself in a  situation in which a same-sex experience seems indicated. That person  may believe he or she is heterosxual and in practice&#44; he or she will  be so defined. But if they do find themselves in that situation and  decide to go ahead&#44; does that mean that&#44; retrospectively&#44; they were  gay or bisexual?  I think such definitions are pointless. Speaking for myself&#44; I cannot  imagine any set of circumstances in which I would find sex with  another male appealing. But not being able to imagine such  circumstances&#44; and there being no such circumstances are not at all  the same thing. Perhaps if people just stopped worrying about who  people were oriented to and left people to try floating their boats  down whatever river seemed inviting at the time there would be a lot  less rubbish being talked.  I know that&#8217;s not Bush&#8217;s position of course&#44; but that doesn&#8217;t mean  Kerry is right either. I think it speaks volumes about the US polity  that even on this matter&#44; neither side is willing to unconditionally  endorse the full sexual rights of gay people&#44; and those that wink at  them have to find an entirely spurious basis for doing so.  The Nerk   As far as I am aware the gays do not want amrriage so much as a recognition   of their relationships in some legal manner.   And although I agree that it is not a marriage because children will not   occur.   Their should be some sort of legal arrangement for the following reasons.   It becomes clear that it is a requirement as we all know only relatives can   visit in hospitals&#44; and if a gay couple have an accident the partner might   be stopped from even comforting their partner because of being unable to   produce any legal attachment?   And I can understand that some legal recogition of the relationship so that   if one dies&#44; the money and/or &nbsp;property wont go to an underserving aunt&#44;   brother or parent leaving the partner destitute?  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
</p>
<p>   Well just today it has become clear that there is a chromosome that  causes    gays.   Wow&#44; &quot;just today&quot;&#44; eh? How exciting! </p>
<p>Would be for you&#44; sounds like you have trouble knowing what day it is&#44;  nevermind what is going on. But I can back whatever I say with factual  reports.  Oh I might add just today is the first acquaitance I have had that there is  even discussion about a gay gene.  http://www.newscientist.com/news/print.jsp?id=ns99996519  Not being gay&#44; or the near gay that cant get their minds of it&#44; I dont give  a stuff one way or the other.  Just dont care how others satisfy their sexual cravings&#44; just dont like to  see persecution and condemnation for practices as long as they are not as  perverted as the West family in England&#44; or legal torture chambers in  countries like Israel &nbsp;that like to claim similiarities with our western  democracies.  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  But the research indicates that the gene is connected with fecundity and    families of gay people &#44; apparently the straight members&#44; have the same  gene    which is the cause of the increased fecundity.   Wow! A gene that makes some people gay and makes others breed a lot&#44;   eh?   Wow! this kind of &quot;knowledge&quot; sounds like it is right up there with   the &quot;bible code&quot; and other great intellectual achievements of that   sort.    As far as I am aware the gays do not want amrriage so much as a  recognition    of their relationships in some legal manner.   Then why do they insist they want &quot;marriage&quot;? </p>
<p>Poor fella&#44; trying hard but way out of his depth. Wants to get back to the  brainwashing&#44; but entertaining &#44; simpsons etc.  The religious want to stop any kind of relationship so compare it with  marriage.   In Australia they have full recognition of their perverted   partnerships&#44; but they *still* want to play at husband and wife. </p>
<p>As I understand in Australia the partnership &nbsp;does not address the matters  below.  So I know it&#8217;s straining your &nbsp;attention span&#44; but check it out.    It becomes clear that it is a requirement as we all know only relatives  can    visit in hospitals&#44; and if a gay couple have an accident the partner  might    be stopped from even comforting their partner because of being unable to    produce any legal attachment?    And I can understand that some legal recogition of the relationship so  that    if one dies&#44; the money and/or &nbsp;property wont go to an underserving aunt&#44;    brother or parent leaving the partner destitute?   You don&#8217;t need to turn &quot;marriage&quot; in a circus to do that. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re not to bright are you&#44; yes marriage gives heterosexual partners all  those things in one hit&#44; so as I understand it &nbsp;partnerships and complex  arrangements have to be made to ensure the same rights for gay couples.  And I would lie to see that so that the matter is taken out of the political  arena&#44; where matters of class induced funding&#44; illegal wars&#44; HTA agreements&#44;  PBS can no longer be &nbsp;submerged by what gays are doing. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>And although I agree that it is not a marriage because children will not  occur. </p>
<p>So in relationships between men &amp; women where 1 of them has a problem  so that they cannot birth children. They shouldnt&#8217; be allowed to get  married eithert? </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>- Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; Well just today it has become clear that there is a chromosome that causes  gays.   Wow&#44; &quot;just today&quot;&#44; eh? How exciting!  But the research indicates that the gene is connected with fecundity and  families of gay people &#44; apparently the straight members&#44; have the same gene  which is the cause of the increased fecundity.   Wow! A gene that makes some people gay and makes others breed a lot&#44;   eh?   Wow! this kind of &quot;knowledge&quot; sounds like it is right up there with   the &quot;bible code&quot; and other great intellectual achievements of that   sort. </p>
<p>&nbsp; &nbsp;Yeah. I concur&#44; as I have not read this&#44; as of yet.  As far as I am aware the gays do not want amrriage so much as a recognition  of their relationships in some legal manner.   Then why do they insist they want &quot;marriage&quot;?   In Australia they have full recognition of their perverted   partnerships&#44; but they *still* want to play at husband and wife. </p>
<p>&nbsp; &nbsp;Well&#44; two people love each other and want to make that statement  before their version of God and man&#8230; and don&#8217;t like being told  they can&#8217;t.  &nbsp; And as far as perversion&#44; that is in your opinion.  &nbsp; But&#44; I can&#8217;t blame you. Animals&#44; like Cats&#44; smell the genetics  that are &quot;different&quot; in their babies&#44; and if too different&#44;  &nbsp; -eat- them at birth&#8230;  &nbsp; You are like those animals&#44; a long time ago such hatred served  a purpose for the race&#44; I am sure.  &nbsp; However&#44; we are no longer animals.  It becomes clear that it is a requirement as we all know only relatives can  visit in hospitals&#44; and if a gay couple have an accident the partner might  be stopped from even comforting their partner because of being unable to  produce any legal attachment?  And I can understand that some legal recogition of the relationship so that  if one dies&#44; the money and/or &nbsp;property wont go to an underserving aunt&#44;  brother or parent leaving the partner destitute? </p>
<p>&nbsp; That&#44; I suspect&#44; is what they don&#8217;t want&#44; as it often reverts back to  the breeding portion of the family.   You don&#8217;t need to turn &quot;marriage&quot; in a circus to do that. </p>
<p>&nbsp; &nbsp;It is only a circus because you are a homophobe. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  One interesting aspect of the last Kerry-Bush debate was his response   on the gay issue.   Now I happen to think&#44; that in least in terms of the big picture   issues&#44; there is little to choose between Kerry and Bush. They think   much the same thing about most everything. I don&#8217;t think there has yet   been a debate in which Kerry has not used the phrase &quot;the President   and I agree on &#8230;&quot; or words to that effect. In one of the debates he   used variations of that phrase three times.   But on the gay issue&#44; there does seem to be a difference&#44; and I&#8217;m   wondering if Kerry&#8217;s view represents the liberal consensus in America.   Kerry implied that Cheney&#8217;s daughter had no choice about being a   lesbian&#44; whereas Bush says he&#8217;s not sure whether it&#8217;s a choice or not.   Curiously for me&#44; I think I&#8217;d have given Bush&#8217;s answer&#44; rather than   Kerry&#8217;s.   I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s at all clear why some people are sexually oriented   to people of their own gender. To the best of my knowledge there are   no studies that clearly show a &quot;gay chromosome&quot;    Well just today it has become clear that there is a chromosome that  causes    gays.    The research concentrating on why and how gay people still exist as it  seems    fairly clear under the normal scheme of things same sex people would  reduce    brcause of no offspring&#44; and should by now have disappeared or be of a  very    small number?    But the research indicates that the gene is connected with fecundity and    families of gay people &#44; apparently the straight members&#44; have the same  gene    which is the cause of the increased fecundity.   &nbsp; &nbsp;Pointers ? I somehow doubt this&#8230; and I support Gay marriage. </p>
<p>I dont&#44; despite the faults of gay couples and the kind of behavior and  problems that can occur in a heterosexual marriage&#44; the Wast family of  England being one horror story one thinks of.  I do not think that gay partners have a marriage.They have a partnership&#44; a  deep and caring partnership&#44; but not the same as marriage?  .  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; &nbsp; &nbsp;I have seen conclusive work on Brain differences&#44; but it remained   a &quot;chicken or egg&quot; argument&#8230;. &nbsp;it may well be hormonal&#44;   which may even be environmentally related&#44; we aren&#8217;t sure.   &nbsp; &nbsp;Gay marriage reduces promiscuity&#44; thus transmission of STD&#8217;s   &nbsp; are inhibited&#8230;   &nbsp; &nbsp;In addition&#44; Marriage forces one to develop a deeper sense of   relationship&#8230;. and work on things&#44; rather than turn and run.   Another good thing&#8230;.   &nbsp; The problem with Gay marriage is the inheritance rights&#44; and   a couple other issue&#8217;s&#8230; most of which are about the children.   &nbsp; Children are our future.   &nbsp; Most of our laws surrounding marriage are there to facilitate   the lives of our children. A Society can know no greater calling&#8230;   &nbsp; And &#44; it is a phony straw man to assume that a gay marriage   would not produce a better role model for children.. it would.   &nbsp; If the parent was gay&#44; that isn&#8217;t going to change. It is   better the child learns the value of fidelity&#44; and sticking   together through thick and thin&#44; rather than a rotating   &quot;other half&quot; on a daily basis.   &nbsp; The child will emulate role model behavior&#44; as far as promiscuity   goes&#8230; but&#44; choice of gender appears to be determined by something   other than role.   &nbsp; &nbsp;But&#44; another concern regarding children is the passing of   the money&#8230;   &nbsp; As it stands today&#44; Uncle &quot;Ernie&quot;&#44; passes on&#44; and the estate   passes back to the family&#44; who in straw man theory&#44; is reproducing&#8230;   &nbsp; Thus&#44; lack of marriage among gays&#44; facilitates our children.   &nbsp; Thus&#44; I suspect&#44; the position among the Kerry group. </p>
<p>I feel you are drawing a very long straw there&#44; I think the fears of  homophiles is to do with the small difference between gay and heterosexual  preferences. And the mere fear that they might be gay is what raiese their  hackles&#44; and well they might be closet&#44; not even able to amit to themselves  that they have gay inclinations?  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  or that can analyse   environment in such a way as to reliably predict homosexual   orientation. And so&#44; on empirical grounds&#44; what other answer can one   give but that one is not sure?   For me&#44; that doesn&#8217;t justify discrimination in any sphere of human   activity. Whether it&#8217;s a lifestyle choice or predicted by genes or any   combination of free will or predisposition is surely irrelevant. In my   view&#44; what consenting adults choose to do sexually is simply no   business of the state&#44; and attempts to vary legal protections   according to gender&#44; or to mitigate a person&#8217;s claims or rights on the   basis of sexual orientation are indefencible. If gay people want to   get married&#44; I say&#44; let them do so. Ironically&#44; gays may turn out to   be one of the last bastions of marriage.   Now I can understand why the notion that gays have no choice in the   matter appeals to those who oppose discrimination. Plainly&#44; if it&#8217;s   like skin colour or ethnicity or genetic disability&#44; then programs to   &quot;cure&quot; it are doomed to failure and will inflict pain without good   purpose. Fears about young people being turned gay by adult gays would   be groundless. Discriminating against people in areas for which they   aren&#8217;t accountable seems clearly wrong.   On the other hand&#44; it does make homosexuality seem a little like a   disease. Perhaps&#44; eventually&#44; if one can isolate the gay gene&#44; one can   modify the sexuality of gays. </p>
<p>You are letting the common discriminatory stance&#44; probably connected &nbsp;to  survival show.  I think all these aflictions are mere survival traits? Diabetes for instance  obviously a survival trait that shows up under certain condiions. And is  advantageous under certain conditions?  Unwanted and perhaps even detested under our normal conditions&#44; but the  implanted by nature/God the incredible variety of genetic branches to ensure  survival of the species under the most varied conditions.  &nbsp;If it&#8217;s environmental&#44; perhaps people  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; can sue those responsible for (unwittingly) turning them gay. Public   policies against &quot;those damn culottes&quot; might have to be instituted. In   the end&#44; gays might come to be bracketed closely with disabled and HIV   positive people &#8212; seen as victims who ought to prefer a cure.   I rather suspect that nobody is purely heterosexual. After all&#44; what   is a homosexual anyway? It is someone who aims to engage in sexual   contact with persons of their own gender. There is ample evidence that   many men who are married with children also engage in a range of   sexual practices with other men&#44; while asserting that they are   heterosexual. In prison&#44; many men satisfy themselves in ways that they   would publicly declaim on the outside. In the end&#44; in my opinion&#44; we   aren&#8217;t oriented to genders&#44; but to people and circumstances. It may   well be that a given man or woman may never find him- or herself in a   situation in which a same-sex experience seems indicated. That person   may believe he or she is heterosxual and in practice&#44; he or she will   be so defined. But if they do find themselves in that situation and   decide to go ahead&#44; does that mean that&#44; retrospectively&#44; they were   gay or bisexual?   I think such definitions are pointless. Speaking for myself&#44; I cannot   imagine any set of circumstances in which I would find sex with   another male appealing. But not being able to imagine such   circumstances&#44; and there being no such circumstances are not at all   the same thing. Perhaps if people just stopped worrying about who   people were oriented to and left people to try floating their boats   down whatever river seemed inviting at the time there would be a lot   less rubbish being talked.   I know that&#8217;s not Bush&#8217;s position of course&#44; </p>
<p>Of course you are fobbimg of here &#44; Bushs position is quite clearly to pick  up the christian vote&#44; those lovely people who dont care who runs the world  and how&#44; as long as there is no abortion and no gay marriage.  So you can back the Jewish protocols&#44; instigate a Jewish inquisition in  america and ensure a base in Israel&#44; as long as you promise that back in  hicksville where ever there will be no abortion and no gay marriage.  You can kill 40000 people in Iraq&#44; regular deaths of Americans in Iraq&#44;  Israel can run with it&#8217;s Nazi policies of genocide and torture to achieve  it&#8217;s nefarious aims as long as there is no abortion and no gay marriage.  They are so obssesed with pregnant young girls and what gays are up to that  I will point out that was part of Hitlers popularity?  So it is a fatal flaw in policy that tjis becomes an issue on deciding  matters of far more concern to the voters like income&#44; health&#44; control of  their own country so that they can expect and receive a fair share of the  national cake.  And properly evaluate governments that are not working for the best interest  of all Americans?  but that doesn&#8217;t mean   Kerry is right either. I think it speaks volumes about the US polity   that even on this matter&#44; neither side is willing to unconditionally   endorse the full sexual rights of gay people&#44; and those that wink at   them have to find an entirely spurious basis for doing so. </p>
<p>And even more so in the case of Bush who blatantly and unashamedly is  playing this card so that indeed Kerry has to saddle himself not only wth a  badly organised and entered into war&#44; a rift wih our usual partners and the  UN&#44; but a divisive policy of pandering the religious right as well.  Which does not give him much more room than Bush&#44; so in comparison it boils  down on everything else being equal&#44; who reveres the traditional values of  the US enough to protect them while dealing with a Bush self  &#8230; read more &raquo;    </p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  And although I agree that it is not a marriage because children will not   occur.   So in relationships between men &amp; women where 1 of them has a problem   so that they cannot birth children. They shouldnt&#8217; be allowed to get   married eithert? </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve asked that myself. I&#8217;m personally aware of one couple who simply  cannot procreate. His problem&#44; her problem? I don&#8217;t know. But as long  as they&#8217;re together&#44; they will never have children. They&#8217;ve been  married for over 20 years. Is this marriage not valid? </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   And although I agree that it is not a marriage because children will not   occur.   So in relationships between men &amp; women where 1 of them has a problem   so that they cannot birth children. They shouldnt&#8217; be allowed to get   married eithert? </p>
<p>Probably not? I mean in reading back the oldies used to say if you married  for children you were a peasant type&#44; so sophiscated city slicker if you  married without the intention of children?  The difference is if a country who did not manufacture cars claimed to want  to join countries who did produce &nbsp;cars by manufacture as the same they  would be told&#44; you are not the same&#44; you buy a lot of cars&#44; you repair a lot  of cars&#44; but you do not manufacture cars.  So although you might be accepted in all ways by these other countries&#44;  there is one respect where you are not the same&#44; you do not manufacture  cars?  In heterosexual marriage the problem is the same? Although you have the  means to manufacture or produce a baby&#44; you do not&#44; and if you buy one it is  still not fully manufactured by the couple as with the heterosexual couple?  So to say that buying a full or half baby belittles the act of motherhood? A  young couple struggles to achieve a position in life to have a baby&#44; go  through all th terrore and tribulations of miscarriage&#44; troublesome births&#44;  and financial hardship to produce&#44; and you want to say that a couple who  could choose when and where they have the baby&#44; in eddect buy a model  without any of the trauma or effort that a heterosexual couple has to go  through? Not to menton reaching stages where they wonder if it&#8217;s safe to  hang his trousers on theend of the bed in case she should have an unwanted  pregnancy?  And also all the complications to health that a women can have with  childbirth. Yes I do not think it is the same in a lot of ways. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   And although I agree that it is not a marriage because children will not   occur.   So in relationships between men &amp; women where 1 of them has a problem   so that they cannot birth children. They shouldnt&#8217; be allowed to get   married eithert?  I&#8217;ve asked that myself. I&#8217;m personally aware of one couple who simply  cannot procreate. His problem&#44; her problem? I don&#8217;t know. But as long  as they&#8217;re together&#44; they will never have children. They&#8217;ve been  married for over 20 years. Is this marriage not valid? </p>
<p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/kerry-and-the-gay-issue-1200670.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>my check up cock up&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/my-check-up-cock-up-2541096.html</link>
		<comments>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/my-check-up-cock-up-2541096.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diabetes Cure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diabetestalking.com/uncategorized/my-check-up-cock-up-2541096.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
Had my six monthly check with the d/nurse  two days after seeing the doc about my feet.  my HbA1c is down a point to 6.2  Blood glucose 88 ( is this good i dont know?)  Blood pressure 130 /70 (and this ?)  previously 180/25 i think  BMI 29.5 (etc) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>Had my six monthly check with the d/nurse  two days after seeing the doc about my feet.  my HbA1c is down a point to 6.2  Blood glucose 88 ( is this good i dont know?)  Blood pressure 130 /70 (and this ?)  previously 180/25 i think  BMI 29.5 (etc)  Turns out the locum that took my fasting bloods forgot to do the cholestrel  one so no result for trigs chol etc.  I was given a Diabetic record card this time so i can track my stats she  said she could not understand why i hadn&#8217;t had one before ( i have only been  DXed for the last three years.) Dohh  As mentioned in a previous post i have MRSA (three years now)  Well i have been offered a chance to discuss using a regime to eradicate it  using methods that involve strict hygiene in the home i.e washing bed linen  daily etc and using betnovate body rubs i have an appointment next week for  this  It has apparently been bought in&#44; in an effort to get people MRSA free  before they go into hospital for operations.  As currently there are too many people turning for ops who already have MRSA  ( free gift last time they were hospitalised no doubt.)  Which brings me on to my dreaded Foot Fungi  As mentioned by Tiger Lily&#44; to name but one &#44; it seems that the spraying of  shoes and disinfection of socks is high on the agenda to effect a cure on  this .  I asked the nurse about this she said she had never heard of anyone having  to disinfect socks and spray shoes etc etc&#44;&#44;&#44;&#44; then ensues a three day  battle to obtain the opinion of a diabetic chiropodist about the laundry  side of things  the upshot of all this is that no one can seem to get hold of one of these  rare and elusive creatures so i have now been given her phone number in the  hope that i can succeed where co workers in the health proffession have not.  No cholestrol test  No diabetic chiropidist opinion  No record card issued for three years or more  I love efficiency &#8230; dont you.  &#8212;  Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.  Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> so sad to hear really <img src='http://diabetestalking.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' />   when do you get the chol tests run?  kate  &#8212;  Join us in the Diabetic-Talk Chatroom on UnderNet  /server irc.undernet.org &#8212; /join #Diabetic-Talk  More info: http://www.diabetic-talk.org/ </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; Had my six monthly check with the d/nurse   two days after seeing the doc about my feet.   my HbA1c is down a point to 6.2   Blood glucose 88 ( is this good i dont know?)   Blood pressure 130 /70 (and this ?)   previously 180/25 i think   BMI 29.5 (etc)   Turns out the locum that took my fasting bloods forgot to do the  cholestrel   one so no result for trigs chol etc.   I was given a Diabetic record card this time so i can track my stats she   said she could not understand why i hadn&#8217;t had one before ( i have only  been   DXed for the last three years.) Dohh   As mentioned in a previous post i have MRSA (three years now)   Well i have been offered a chance to discuss using a regime to eradicate  it   using methods that involve strict hygiene in the home i.e washing bed  linen   daily etc and using betnovate body rubs i have an appointment next week  for   this   It has apparently been bought in&#44; in an effort to get people MRSA free   before they go into hospital for operations.   As currently there are too many people turning for ops who already have  MRSA   ( free gift last time they were hospitalised no doubt.)   Which brings me on to my dreaded Foot Fungi   As mentioned by Tiger Lily&#44; to name but one &#44; it seems that the spraying  of   shoes and disinfection of socks is high on the agenda to effect a cure on   this .   I asked the nurse about this she said she had never heard of anyone having   to disinfect socks and spray shoes etc etc&#44;&#44;&#44;&#44; then ensues a three day   battle to obtain the opinion of a diabetic chiropodist about the laundry   side of things   the upshot of all this is that no one can seem to get hold of one of these   rare and elusive creatures so i have now been given her phone number in  the   hope that i can succeed where co workers in the health proffession have  not.   No cholestrol test   No diabetic chiropidist opinion   No record card issued for three years or more   I love efficiency &#8230; dont you.   &#8212;   Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.   Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   so sad to hear really <img src='http://diabetestalking.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' />    when do you get the chol tests run?   kate </p>
<p>Hi  Next week for fasting bloods then wait another week i s&#8217;pose for these test  results.  I do hope to get hold of this elusive diabetic chiropodist  that should be intresting&#8230;  &#8212;  Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.  Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   10:54:23 Sun&#44; 10 Oct 2004alt.support.diabetes.uk    I asked the nurse about this she said she had never heard of anyone  having    to disinfect socks and spray shoes etc etc&#44;&#44;&#44;&#44; then ensues a three day    battle to obtain the opinion of a diabetic chiropodist about the  laundry    side of things   Take a peek at any athlete&#8217;s foot preparation in the chemist&#8230; general   disinfection is mentioned or at least implied in the instructions and is   totally necessary. For example&#44; with the Scholl cream&#44; they say you   should use the powder too on your socks. </p>
<p>Well it appears that she is right and you lot are all wrong &lt;G  Went to see the diabetic chiropodist today  she said that as long as i put my trainers through the washing machine and  the same with my socks&#44; given current meds for six weeks it will clear up in  eight weeks.  Also  Must avoid man made fibres in my socks.  Only cotton and wool.  new trainers or walking shoes would be a big advantage  but in her opinion that will do the trick.  I think someone is sitting on a fence here.  Lets face it if the doc says i need sprays for my shoes etc maybe they are  worried i will ask for them on prescription&#8230;  I am honestly convinced that the advice on disinfecting socks and spraying  shoes is the right way to go but it was nice to observe the opinion of a  podiatrist.  Thanks to you all thus far  Lets face what do they know really!.  &#8212;  Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.  Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  Had my six monthly check with the d/nurse   two days after seeing the doc about my feet.   my HbA1c is down a point to 6.2   Blood glucose 88 ( is this good i dont know?) </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t know &#8211; is that the American system&#44; or should it be 8.8? 8.8 isn&#8217;t  great.   Blood pressure 130 /70 (and this ?) </p>
<p>I&#8217;d be happy to have mine thereabouts.   previously 180/25 i think   BMI 29.5 (etc) </p>
<p>Overweight&#44; but not obese. BMI should be between 20 and 25&#44; I think.   Turns out the locum that took my fasting bloods forgot to do the cholestrel   one so no result for trigs chol etc.   I was given a Diabetic record card this time so i can track my stats she   said she could not understand why i hadn&#8217;t had one before ( i have only been   DXed for the last three years.) Dohh </p>
<p>Never heard of one of these&#44; but my dx was only a year ago. Why not use  the Health software that you can download free from Ratty&#8217;s website  http://www.flyingrat.net/  Go to the &quot;Diabetes&quot; section&#44; then &quot;Databases&quot;.   As mentioned in a previous post i have MRSA (three years now)   Well i have been offered a chance to discuss using a regime to eradicate it   using methods that involve strict hygiene in the home i.e washing bed linen   daily etc and using betnovate body rubs i have an appointment next week for   this </p>
<p>If you do get into washing the bed linen daily [and I would assume  towels and such as well]&#44; it might be worth seeing if there&#8217;s a  professional laundry in your area &#8211; the sort that takes in the stuff&#44;  washes&#44; dries&#44; and folds. There aren&#8217;t that many of them around anymore&#44;  and it might be a pricey option&#44; but it would be a lot easier [and less  stressful] than dealing with that much washing yourself. Did they say  how long this regime would last? Or is it open-ended?   It has apparently been bought in&#44; in an effort to get people MRSA free   before they go into hospital for operations.   As currently there are too many people turning for ops who already have MRSA   ( free gift last time they were hospitalised no doubt.)   Which brings me on to my dreaded Foot Fungi   As mentioned by Tiger Lily&#44; to name but one &#44; it seems that the spraying of   shoes and disinfection of socks is high on the agenda to effect a cure on   this . </p>
<p>Since fungi reproduce by releasing spores&#44; which then &quot;hatch&quot; [or  whatever it is that spores do]&#44; making more fungi&#44; I would think  disinfection would be pretty important. A quick google found this  diagrammatic of the life cycle of a particular type of fungus  http://www.uark.edu/misc/aphid/lifecycle/life.html  I think all fungi work in pretty much the same way.   I asked the nurse about this she said she had never heard of anyone having   to disinfect socks and spray shoes etc etc&#44;&#44;&#44;&#44; then ensues a three day   battle to obtain the opinion of a diabetic chiropodist about the laundry   side of things   the upshot of all this is that no one can seem to get hold of one of these   rare and elusive creatures so i have now been given her phone number in the   hope that i can succeed where co workers in the health proffession have not.   No cholestrol test   No diabetic chiropidist opinion   No record card issued for three years or more   I love efficiency &#8230; dont you. </p>
<p>Yeah&#44; we should try it occasionally.  If I were you&#44; I think I would write a letter to the practice manager&#44;  detailing what&#8217;s happened. That&#8217;s really too many cock-ups in one go.  Maggie </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   a dermatologist is going to give you better advice sooner from the sounds  of   things </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll post what happens when i finally get a hold of the diabetic  chiropodist..  &#8212;  Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.  Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>a dermatologist is going to give you better advice sooner from the sounds of  things  &#8212;  Join us in the Diabetic-Talk Chatroom on UnderNet  /server irc.undernet.org &#8212; /join #Diabetic-Talk  More info: http://www.diabetic-talk.org/ </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;   so sad to hear really <img src='http://diabetestalking.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' />     when do you get the chol tests run?    kate   Hi   Next week for fasting bloods then wait another week i s&#8217;pose for these  test   results.   I do hope to get hold of this elusive diabetic chiropodist   that should be intresting&#8230;   &#8212;   Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.   Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/my-check-up-cock-up-2541096.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Misinformation</title>
		<link>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/misinformation-2544934.html</link>
		<comments>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/misinformation-2544934.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diabetes Cure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diabetestalking.com/uncategorized/misinformation-2544934.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
  There are always those that stick to a website forum and express utter   rubbish.   They have nothing to offer but selfish and erroneous nonsense.   If this pretends to be a diabetic exchange &#8211; I suggest some may be   more careful in their opinions.   [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>  There are always those that stick to a website forum and express utter   rubbish.   They have nothing to offer but selfish and erroneous nonsense.   If this pretends to be a diabetic exchange &#8211; I suggest some may be   more careful in their opinions.   Otherwise I may have to correct certain habitual posters.   And you will understand the law. </p>
<p>I presume you are going to explain yourself?  R  &#8212;  www.flyingrat.net </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>There are always those that stick to a website forum and express utter  rubbish.  They have nothing to offer but selfish and erroneous nonsense.  If this pretends to be a diabetic exchange &#8211; I suggest some may be  more careful in their opinions.  Otherwise I may have to correct certain habitual posters.  And you will understand the law. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> &#8212;  e-mail me at geraldine(underlined space)ms(littlesnailything) bigfoot dot com  only without the spaces. &nbsp;If you e-mail me at hotmail&#44; I may never see it&#44; but&#44;  if you must&#44; take out the 25th. &amp; 26th. letters) </p>
<p>I will never have a need to try it&#44; but I love the simple  instructions:-)  Cheers&#44; Alan&#44; T2 d&amp;e&#44; Australia.  Remove weight and carbs to email.  &#8212;  Everything in Moderation &#8211; Except Laughter. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> x-no-archive: yes   Ooh&#44; does that mean another session with the wet celery stick and the   whipped cream? Oh goody! Oops&#8230; &lt;blush  Can I volunteer&#44; Emma? Please&#44; pretty please? </p>
<p>Please form an orderly queue. <img src='http://diabetestalking.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />   giggle!  Thanks for lightening us up. </p>
<p>My pleasure&#44; I always find the best way to deal with pompous twits like  Mr Mentzer is to point out what a fool he is making of himself.  &#8212;  Emma &#8211; The Chocolate Monster </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> Otherwise I may have to correct certain habitual posters. </p>
<p>Ooh&#44; does that mean another session with the wet celery stick and the  whipped cream? Oh goody! Oops&#8230; &lt;blush  &#8212;  Emma &#8211; The Chocolate Monster </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> There are always those that stick to a website forum and express utter  rubbish.  They have nothing to offer but selfish and erroneous nonsense.  If this pretends to be a diabetic exchange &#8211; I suggest some may be  more careful in their opinions.  Otherwise I may have to correct certain habitual posters.  And you will understand the law. </p>
<p>Hi Cal  I answered you on a.s.d.  I didn&#8217;t really realise what a twit you were until I saw you here. I  expect twits on a.s.d. amd live with it&#44; but here?  Go away&#44; fool. I must admit&#44; you picked an excellent subject heading.  Cheers&#44; Alan&#44; T2 d&amp;e&#44; Australia.  Remove weight and carbs to email.  &#8212;  Everything in Moderation &#8211; Except Laughter. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;   There are always those that stick to a website forum and express utter    rubbish.    They have nothing to offer but selfish and erroneous nonsense.    If this pretends to be a diabetic exchange &#8211; I suggest some may be    more careful in their opinions.    Otherwise I may have to correct certain habitual posters.    And you will understand the law.   I presume you are going to explain yourself? </p>
<p>Is he buggery Ratty&#44; he&#8217;s going to come round and slap us in t&#8217; gob. (He  wishes:-)  Beav </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   There are always those that stick to a website forum and express utter   rubbish. </p>
<p>And there are those who just troll NG&#8217;s.   They have nothing to offer but selfish and erroneous nonsense. </p>
<p>And those trolls have nothing at ALL to offer.   If this pretends to be a diabetic exchange &#8211; I suggest some may be   more careful in their opinions. </p>
<p>I suggest exactly the same. Good thing THIS place doesn&#8217;t pretend to be  anything then eh?   Otherwise I may have to correct certain habitual posters. </p>
<p>Ahh&#44; a cyber threatner. All the fucking same. Big mouth&#44; no dick and most  CERTAINLY no balls.   And you will understand the law. </p>
<p>For you am de judge. Ok&#44; we&#8217;ve all shit ourselves now&#44; so you won. Now you  can fuck off and leave us in peace.  Beav </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  Is he buggery Ratty&#44; he&#8217;s going to come round and slap us in t&#8217; gob. (He   wishes:-) </p>
<p>I hope so.  Not kicked a troll around for a while now&#44; and where better than our  little corner of Usenet to cave their bollocks in  Ratty  &#8212;  www.flyingrat.net </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   There are always those that stick to a website forum and express utter   rubbish.   They have nothing to offer but selfish and erroneous nonsense.   If this pretends to be a diabetic exchange &#8211; I suggest some may be   more careful in their opinions.   Otherwise I may have to correct certain habitual posters.   And you will understand the law. </p>
<p>Ah lovely&#44; nothing better for a diabetic support group than somoene randomly  dispensing threats.  I particularly enjoy the bit about the law. &nbsp;Which law? &nbsp;Of which country?  Which is applicable in which circumstance? &nbsp;You may have accidenally tripped  over something which could be interesting. &nbsp;Of course this is the wrong  group for it&#44; so it would be an OT discussion.  Apart from that this post appears to be self-interested nonsense.  Trying to be ironic?  VBH  T2/UK/A1c 5.8/ 1000Met/Dx Oct-03 </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  Is he buggery Ratty&#44; he&#8217;s going to come round and slap us in t&#8217; gob. (He   wishes:-)   I hope so.   Not kicked a troll around for a while now&#44; and where better than our   little corner of Usenet to cave their bollocks in   Ratty </p>
<p>You are assuming he has bollocks!  &#8212;  Chris Quinn  T2 Metformin 1500mg&#44; Asprin 75mg  dx March 04  HBA1c 7.5%&#44; June 04 </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  Trying to be ironic?   No &#8211; trying to sound sane.   But failing.   Cheers&#44; Alan&#44; T2 d&amp;e&#44; Australia.   Remove weight and carbs to email.   &#8212;   Everything in Moderation &#8211; Except Laughter.   He might as well have said:   &quot;Hi&#44;   Abuse me&quot;   VBH   T2/UK/A1c 5.8/ 1000Met/Dx Oct-03 </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;s quite capable of abusing himself &#8211; he sounds like a right  wanker to me!  &#8212;  Chris Quinn  T2 Metformin 1000mg&#44; Asprin 75mg &nbsp;  dx March 04  HBA1c 7.5%&#44; June 04 </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   Trying to be ironic?   No &#8211; trying to sound sane.   But failing.   Cheers&#44; Alan&#44; T2 d&amp;e&#44; Australia.   Remove weight and carbs to email.   &#8212;   Everything in Moderation &#8211; Except Laughter. </p>
<p>He might as well have said:  &quot;Hi&#44;  Abuse me&quot;  VBH  T2/UK/A1c 5.8/ 1000Met/Dx Oct-03 </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> Trying to be ironic? </p>
<p>No &#8211; trying to sound sane.  But failing.  Cheers&#44; Alan&#44; T2 d&amp;e&#44; Australia.  Remove weight and carbs to email.  &#8212;  Everything in Moderation &#8211; Except Laughter. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>    Is he buggery Ratty&#44; he&#8217;s going to come round and slap us in t&#8217; gob. (He    wishes:-)   I hope so.   Not kicked a troll around for a while now&#44; and where better than our   little corner of Usenet to cave their bollocks in </p>
<p>Bollock caving should be a national sport mate <img src='http://diabetestalking.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Beats the crap out of pot  holing anyroad:)))  Beav </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>I note your responses.  It holds no surprise. Many feel the need to defend the nonsense they  have perpretated on others. What I consider here is lost little boys  and girls seeking help from the diabetic curse.  I can understand that. And I can understand your anger at the  unfairness of it all. But let us not argue. And we should not attack  each other &#8211; if we are truthful.  Sound advice can be confirmed. What is erroneous is heresay and  emotionality. Never mistake opinion for fact.  Many here make political comment. May I suggest you transfer that  energy to your political representatives and ensure funding is given  to diabetic research for a cure. Rather than to the Billions of  Dollars&#44; Euros and Sterling given to &quot;political&quot; diseases.  If you understand that &#8211; then you will understand me.  My respects  &#8211; </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -I note your responses.  It holds no surprise. Many feel the need to defend the nonsense they  have perpretated on others. What I consider here is lost little boys  and girls seeking help from the diabetic curse.  I can understand that. And I can understand your anger at the  unfairness of it all. But let us not argue. And we should not attack  each other &#8211; if we are truthful.  Sound advice can be confirmed. What is erroneous is heresay and  emotionality. Never mistake opinion for fact.  Many here make political comment. May I suggest you transfer that  energy to your political representatives and ensure funding is given  to diabetic research for a cure. Rather than to the Billions of  Dollars&#44; Euros and Sterling given to &quot;political&quot; diseases.  If you understand that &#8211; then you will understand me.  My respects  &#8211; </p>
<p>Hi Cal  I must have missed your earlier response. Please direct me again to your  earlier posts on your experiences with diabetes and your support for  others here.  Sorry&#44; but I did try google and couldn&#8217;t find any&#44; but maybe you did the  x-no thing?  I mean&#44; you have provided some supportive comments&#44; or answered some  queries here or on one of the other diabetes ngs&#44; haven&#8217;t you?  You&#8217;re not one of those who lurk&#44; chiming in with an occasional glorious  pompous pontification? Surely not?  Of course&#44; you could just piss off.  Cheers&#44; Alan&#44; T2 d&amp;e&#44; Australia.  Remove weight and carbs to email.  &#8212;  Everything in Moderation &#8211; Except Laughter. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  I note your responses.   It holds no surprise. Many feel the need to defend the nonsense they   have perpretated on others. What I consider here is lost little boys   and girls seeking help from the diabetic curse.   I can understand that. And I can understand your anger at the   unfairness of it all. But let us not argue. And we should not attack   each other &#8211; if we are truthful.   Sound advice can be confirmed. What is erroneous is heresay and   emotionality. Never mistake opinion for fact.   Many here make political comment. May I suggest you transfer that   energy to your political representatives and ensure funding is given   to diabetic research for a cure. Rather than to the Billions of   Dollars&#44; Euros and Sterling given to &quot;political&quot; diseases.   If you understand that &#8211; then you will understand me.   My respects   &#8211;   Hi Cal   I must have missed your earlier response. Please direct me again to your   earlier posts on your experiences with diabetes and your support for   others here.   Sorry&#44; but I did try google and couldn&#8217;t find any&#44; but maybe you did the   x-no thing?   I mean&#44; you have provided some supportive comments&#44; or answered some   queries here or on one of the other diabetes ngs&#44; haven&#8217;t you?   You&#8217;re not one of those who lurk&#44; chiming in with an occasional glorious   pompous pontification? Surely not?   Of course&#44; you could just piss off.   Cheers&#44; Alan&#44; T2 d&amp;e&#44; Australia.   Remove weight and carbs to email.   &#8212;   Everything in Moderation &#8211; Except Laughter. </p>
<p>Got to work this morning&#44; read this post&#44; PMSL.  Thanks for a great start to the day&#44; Alan  VBH  T2/UK/A1c 5.8/ 1000Met/Dx Oct-03 </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>have perpretated on others </p>
<p>Tsk Tsk. &nbsp;Spelling!  BTW are you &quot;speaking&quot; English? &#8216;Cos I can&#8217;t understand what you&#8217;re trying  to say at all. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> Otherwise I may have to correct certain habitual posters.  Ooh&#44; does that mean another session with the wet celery stick and the  whipped cream? Oh goody! Oops&#8230; &lt;blush </p>
<p>I prefer the butternut squash and mayonnaise. &nbsp;Ensure that the bulbous end of  the butternut squash goes in first.  JPG </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   I note your responses.   It holds no surprise. Many feel the need to defend the nonsense they   have perpretated on others. What I consider here is lost little boys   and girls seeking help from the diabetic curse. </p>
<p>FYI diabetes is a disease! The only curse we have to suffer is idiot trolls  like you.   I can understand that. And I can understand your anger at the   unfairness of it all. But let us not argue. And we should not attack   each other &#8211; if we are truthful. </p>
<p>You do not understand or you would not of posted this garbage.   Sound advice can be confirmed. What is erroneous is heresay and   emotionality. Never mistake opinion for fact. </p>
<p>I agree&#44; I would not mistake your post for fact.   Many here make political comment. May I suggest you transfer that   energy to your political representatives and ensure funding is given   to diabetic research for a cure. Rather than to the Billions of   Dollars&#44; Euros and Sterling given to &quot;political&quot; diseases. </p>
<p>After I read that I am sure you are on the wrong group. Please note the .uk  at the end it means most of us do not pay for our medications and those that  do&#44; do not pay half of what diabetics in other countries pay.   If you understand that &#8211; then you will understand me.   My respects   &#8211; </p>
<p>If you had any respect you would not be using a yahoo posting address or  google to post from stop hiding you bloody coward and show your self.  DaveT </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   FYI diabetes is a disease   Actually&#44; I don&#8217;t think of it as a disease. &nbsp;That&#8217;s more something you can   catch. &nbsp;Diabetes is a problem that part of MY BODY has. &nbsp;I&#8217;m not angry  with   it&#44; rather I feel a bit sorry for it. &nbsp;I&#8217;m trying to support it as best I   can for the greater good (of the whole me).   &#8212;   Bob   Dx T1 4/4/2003&#44; just a few units of novorapid when I need it   (trying zeroish carb &#8211; kiddies&#44; do not try this at home) </p>
<p>It was the stupid remark about the curse I was getting at. If I caught AIDS  or developed cancer or any of a load of really disabling/fatal conditions  then I *might* think I had bean cursed.  To think of diabetes as a curse shows an ignorance of the term and a bit too  much self pity for me to stomach.  I seem to remember a group of medics at some worldly gathering about a year  or two back declared in there wisdom it was to be henceforth called a  disease because previous to then they could not make their minds up if it  was a condition&#44; disability or a disease.  I have always thought of it as a bloody nuisance.  DaveT </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   I note your responses.   It holds no surprise. Many feel the need to defend the nonsense they   have perpretated on others. What I consider here is lost little boys   and girls seeking help from the diabetic curse.   I can understand that. And I can understand your anger at the   unfairness of it all. </p>
<p>You couldn&#8217;t understand it or you&#8217;d realise we&#8217;re not &quot;angry&quot; about &quot;the  unfairness of it all&quot; Who gives a shit? We&#8217;ve got it&#44; we live with it and  that&#8217;s fine by me. Be thankfull YOU dn&#8217;t have it.  But let us not argue. And we should not attack   each other &#8211; if we are truthful.   Sound advice can be confirmed. What is erroneous is heresay and   emotionality. Never mistake opinion for fact. </p>
<p>And never mistake your opinion for being worth a toss.   Many here make political comment. </p>
<p>And?  May I suggest you transfer that   energy to your political representatives and ensure funding is given   to diabetic research for a cure. Rather than to the Billions of   Dollars&#44; Euros and Sterling given to &quot;political&quot; diseases.   If you understand that &#8211; then you will understand me. </p>
<p>You assume that we WANT to understand you. Pesonlly I&#8217;d prefer not to hear  from you.  Beav </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> Try and be a man.  Look in the mirror  Try and be a man.  Look in the mirror  Try and be a man.  Look in the mirror  Try and be a man. </p>
<p>Well&#44; you tried anyway.  Full marks for trying&#44; pity you&#8217;ll never make it.  Cheers&#44; Alan  &#8212; </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Naturally I do not respect what you may respect. I cannot tolerate  weakness.  There are two types of doctors:  1) Those that pander and lie. Then tear their hair out at the  stupidity and ignorance of those that attend their appointments. And  they return and return.  2) Those that regard you as something of a rabbit. This will apply to  many.  Stop being a fool.  If you wish to argue do so with those that consider you as foolish.  I note the childish bravado. Educate your brain. Try and be a man.  &#8211; </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/misinformation-2544934.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is ethical???</title>
		<link>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/what-is-ethical-2544330.html</link>
		<comments>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/what-is-ethical-2544330.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diabetes Cure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diabetestalking.com/uncategorized/what-is-ethical-2544330.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
From the Diabetes UK E-mail  Stop press:  Diabetes UK awaits stem cell decision  Researchers in Newcastle are the first to apply for a licence to clone  human embryos for use in stem cell research to cure diabetes. The Human  Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) are currently assessing the  application [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>From the Diabetes UK E-mail  Stop press:  Diabetes UK awaits stem cell decision  Researchers in Newcastle are the first to apply for a licence to clone  human embryos for use in stem cell research to cure diabetes. The Human  Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) are currently assessing the  application with a decision due soon. Read the full story at  http://www.diabetes.org.uk/news/June04/stemcell.htm  As the word embryo is rather misleading because they are planning to use  eggs before they are inseminated I would have thought the question was is it  right to let the living suffer or to let unused human eggs die off&#44; rather  than an ethical argument that will get the pro-lifers all worked up.  I hope for once common sence prevails.  DaveT </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>- Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; From the Diabetes UK E-mail  Stop press:  Diabetes UK awaits stem cell decision  Researchers in Newcastle are the first to apply for a licence to clone  human embryos for use in stem cell research to cure diabetes. The Human  Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) are currently assessing the  application with a decision due soon. Read the full story at  http://www.diabetes.org.uk/news/June04/stemcell.htm  As the word embryo is rather misleading because they are planning to use  eggs before they are inseminated I would have thought the question was is it  right to let the living suffer or to let unused human eggs die off&#44; rather  than an ethical argument that will get the pro-lifers all worked up.  I hope for once common sence prevails.  DaveT </p>
<p>Hi Dave  For a diabetic to be against stem cell research is akin to those  religious groups who let their people die for want of a blood  transfusion. The belief may be sincere&#44; but there is a high price to  pay.  For a diabetic with cancer to be opposed would be taking it to extremes.  I don&#8217;t believe in extremes.  Cheers&#44; Alan&#44; T2 d&amp;e&#44; Australia.  Remove weight and carbs to email.  &#8212;  Everything in Moderation &#8211; Except Laughter. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; From the Diabetes UK E-mail   Stop press:   Diabetes UK awaits stem cell decision   Researchers in Newcastle are the first to apply for a licence to clone   human embryos for use in stem cell research to cure diabetes. The Human   Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) are currently assessing the   application with a decision due soon. Read the full story at   http://www.diabetes.org.uk/news/June04/stemcell.htm   As the word embryo is rather misleading because they are planning to use   eggs before they are inseminated I would have thought the question was is  it   right to let the living suffer or to let unused human eggs die off&#44; rather   than an ethical argument that will get the pro-lifers all worked up.   I hope for once common sence prevails. </p>
<p>And there&#8217;s a snowballs chance in hell of that happening.  Beav </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>- Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; From the Diabetes UK E-mail  Stop press:  Diabetes UK awaits stem cell decision  Researchers in Newcastle are the first to apply for a licence to clone  human embryos for use in stem cell research to cure diabetes. The Human  Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) are currently assessing the  application with a decision due soon. Read the full story at  http://www.diabetes.org.uk/news/June04/stemcell.htm  As the word embryo is rather misleading because they are planning to use  eggs before they are inseminated I would have thought the question was is it  right to let the living suffer or to let unused human eggs die off&#44; rather  than an ethical argument that will get the pro-lifers all worked up.  I hope for once common sence prevails. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s nothing to do with ethics IMHO&#44; it&#8217;s just the &quot;every sperm is sacred&quot;  attitude of the RC and fundamentalist religions which seems to spin off into  distrust or even outright hatred of science amongst the scientifically  sub-literate politicians and other power-mongers such as the tabloid newspaper  bosses. &nbsp;  JPG  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -DaveT  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   It&#8217;s nothing to do with ethics IMHO </p>
<p>Perthonally&#44; I prefer Thuthex to Ethics!  I&#8217;ll get me coat.  Kevin the Lurker </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> As the word embryo is rather misleading because they are planning to use  eggs before they are inseminated I would have thought the question was is it  right to let the living suffer or to let unused human eggs die off&#44; rather  than an ethical argument that will get the pro-lifers all worked up.  I hope for once common sence prevails.  It&#8217;s nothing to do with ethics IMHO&#44; it&#8217;s just the &quot;every sperm is sacred&quot;  attitude of the RC and fundamentalist religions which seems to spin off into  distrust or even outright hatred of science amongst the scientifically  sub-literate politicians and other power-mongers such as the tabloid newspaper  bosses. &nbsp;  JPG </p>
<p>Thanks for the reminder. &nbsp;I answered seriously earlier; of course there  is another side:  http://www.wilken.freeserve.co.uk/Montypython/Songs/song15.htm  Cheers&#44; Alan&#44; T2 d&amp;e&#44; Australia.  Remove weight and carbs to email.  &#8212;  Everything in Moderation &#8211; Except Laughter. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
</p>
<p>Except of course that there is no sperm involved in this case &#8211; its about  cloning.  TBF to the religionists ( a Bushism ? ) they do not think all sperm are  sacred but all human LIFE is sacred. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/what-is-ethical-2544330.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collodial Silver</title>
		<link>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/collodial-silver-2477846.html</link>
		<comments>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/collodial-silver-2477846.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diabetes Cure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diabetestalking.com/uncategorized/collodial-silver-2477846.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
I never said that collodial silver will cure your ailment. I will say  the following.  As an antibiotic&#44; Silver kills over 650 disease causing organisms;  resistant strains fail to develop. Silver is absolutely nontoxic.  Silver is the best all-around germ fighter we have. Doctors are  reporting that&#44; taken internally&#44; it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>I never said that collodial silver will cure your ailment. I will say  the following.  As an antibiotic&#44; Silver kills over 650 disease causing organisms;  resistant strains fail to develop. Silver is absolutely nontoxic.  Silver is the best all-around germ fighter we have. Doctors are  reporting that&#44; taken internally&#44; it works against syphilis&#44; cholera&#44;  malaria&#44; diabetes and severe burns. (Bio/Tech News&#44; 1995)  If It&#8217;s good against strep A. Will it work for any other pathogen?  Look it up or try it. I saw a list somewhere of all 650 of them. I  reccomend collodial silver for anyone with a possible infection.  Chronic fatigue &#44; etc.&#44; etc  If you do try this&#44; make sure to eat &quot;active culture&quot; &nbsp;yogurt or take  a supplement. Supplents should already be on your list. good luck. God  bless. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>In &lt;news:pmc4705i45ecr59gj9ugmug556tpdimdhk@4ax.com&gt;&#44;  Dali said:  &gt; make sure to eat &quot;active culture&quot; </p>
<p>At present&#44; the most active would have to be Arab Islamic culture&#44; and I  just happen to know a belly dancer who looks good enough to eat.  ((U))  &nbsp; M </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>michelle downunder wrote:  &gt; On Mon&#44; 5 Apr 2004 21:50:22 -0700&#44; &quot;Michael&quot; &lt;muirh&#8230;@haidagwaii.net&gt;  &gt; wrote:  &gt;&gt;At present&#44; the most active would have to be Arab Islamic culture&#44; and I  &gt;&gt;just happen to know a belly dancer who looks good enough to eat.  &gt; LOL  &gt; your mind is at the same level as mine&#8230;.  &gt; Michelle </p>
<p>Throw me a rope so I can get up there.  melodymom </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>In &lt;news:c4th6h$2lrm8k$1@ID-69147.news.uni-berlin.de&gt;&#44;  melodynamic said:  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -&gt; michelle downunder wrote:  &gt;&gt; On Mon&#44; 5 Apr 2004 21:50:22 -0700&#44; &quot;Michael&quot;  &gt;&gt; &lt;muirh&#8230;@haidagwaii.net&gt; wrote:  &gt;&gt;&gt; At present&#44; the most active would have to be Arab Islamic culture&#44;  &gt;&gt;&gt; and I just happen to know a belly dancer who looks good enough to  &gt;&gt;&gt; eat.  &gt;&gt; LOL  &gt;&gt; your mind is at the same level as mine&#8230;.  &gt;&gt; Michelle  &gt; Throw me a rope so I can get up there.  &gt; melodymom </p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to keep your eyes on the road when your mind&#8217;s in the gutter.  ((U))  &nbsp; M </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Michael wrote:  &gt; In &lt;news:c4th6h$2lrm8k$1@ID-69147.news.uni-berlin.de&gt;&#44;  &gt;&gt;Throw me a rope so I can get up there.  &gt;&gt;melodymom  &gt; It&#8217;s hard to keep your eyes on the road when your mind&#8217;s in the gutter.  &gt; ((U))  &gt; &nbsp; M </p>
<p>That&#8217;s probably why they took my keys away. &nbsp;But why won&#8217;t they let me  have scissors?  mm </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>In &lt;news:c4thvu$2l9ive$1@ID-69147.news.uni-berlin.de&gt;&#44;  melodynamic said:  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -&gt; Michael wrote:  &gt;&gt; In &lt;news:c4th6h$2lrm8k$1@ID-69147.news.uni-berlin.de&gt;&#44;  &gt;&gt;&gt; Throw me a rope so I can get up there.  &gt;&gt;&gt; melodymom  &gt;&gt; It&#8217;s hard to keep your eyes on the road when your mind&#8217;s in the  &gt;&gt; gutter.  &gt;&gt; ((U))  &gt;&gt; &nbsp; M  &gt; That&#8217;s probably why they took my keys away. &nbsp;But why won&#8217;t they let me  &gt; have scissors?  &gt; mm </p>
<p>Shear madness?  ((U))  &nbsp; M </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Michael wrote:  &gt;&gt;That&#8217;s probably why they took my keys away. &nbsp;But why won&#8217;t they let me  &gt;&gt;have scissors?  &gt;&gt;mm  &gt; Shear madness?  &gt; ((U))  &gt; &nbsp; M </p>
<p>ROFL!!! &nbsp;You win. &nbsp;;)  Goodnight.  mm </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>&lt;sputter&gt; coffee all over the monitor..  &lt;tapping foot&gt; I did not hear the customary warning.&#8217;Laura&#44; swallow&#8217;  &#8212;  Laura  &quot;Michael&quot; &lt;muirh&#8230;@haidagwaii.net&gt; wrote in message </p>
<p>news:c4tcuo$2hfse0$1@ID-78693.news.uni-berlin.de&#8230;  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -&gt; In &lt;news:pmc4705i45ecr59gj9ugmug556tpdimdhk@4ax.com&gt;&#44;  &gt; Dali said:  &gt; &gt; make sure to eat &quot;active culture&quot;  &gt; At present&#44; the most active would have to be Arab Islamic culture&#44; and I  &gt; just happen to know a belly dancer who looks good enough to eat.  &gt; ((U))  &gt; &nbsp; M  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>PLEASE be so kind as to keep alt.support.alzheimers out of these threads&#44; we  are really not interested.  Thanks&#44;  Evelyn  &quot;Laura&quot; &lt;the_happy_w&#8230;@myrealbox.com&gt; wrote in message </p>
<p>news:Ycxcc.120355$8G2.100509@fe3.columbus.rr.com&#8230;  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -&gt; &lt;sputter&gt; coffee all over the monitor..  &gt; &lt;tapping foot&gt; I did not hear the customary warning.&#8217;Laura&#44; swallow&#8217;  &gt; &#8212;  &gt; Laura  &gt; &quot;Michael&quot; &lt;muirh&#8230;@haidagwaii.net&gt; wrote in message  &gt; news:c4tcuo$2hfse0$1@ID-78693.news.uni-berlin.de&#8230;  &gt; &gt; In &lt;news:pmc4705i45ecr59gj9ugmug556tpdimdhk@4ax.com&gt;&#44;  &gt; &gt; Dali said:  &gt; &gt; &gt; make sure to eat &quot;active culture&quot;  &gt; &gt; At present&#44; the most active would have to be Arab Islamic culture&#44; and I  &gt; &gt; just happen to know a belly dancer who looks good enough to eat.  &gt; &gt; ((U))  &gt; &gt; &nbsp; M  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Laura wrote:  &gt; &lt;sputter&gt; coffee all over the monitor..  &gt; &lt;tapping foot&gt; I did not hear the customary warning.&#8217;Laura&#44; swallow&#8217; </p>
<p>LOL &nbsp; Always consider the source. &nbsp;Clicking &quot;next&quot; can be hazardous to  your screen&#8230;  melodymom </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Melodynamic&#44;  PLEASE be so kind as to remove alt.support.alzheimers from the headers when  you reply to this thread?  We&#8217;d appreciate it very much.  Thanks&#44;  Evelyn  &quot;melodynamic&quot; &lt;melodymo&#8230;@yahoo.com&gt; wrote in message </p>
<p>news:c4ukps$2mchh1$3@ID-69147.news.uni-berlin.de&#8230;  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -&gt; Laura wrote:  &gt; &gt; &lt;sputter&gt; coffee all over the monitor..  &gt; &gt; &lt;tapping foot&gt; I did not hear the customary warning.&#8217;Laura&#44; swallow&#8217;  &gt; LOL &nbsp; Always consider the source. &nbsp;Clicking &quot;next&quot; can be hazardous to  &gt; your screen&#8230;  &gt; melodymom  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>- Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -Dali wrote:  &gt;I never said that collodial silver will cure your ailment. I will say  &gt;the following.  &gt;As an antibiotic&#44; Silver kills over 650 disease causing organisms;  &gt;resistant strains fail to develop. Silver is absolutely nontoxic.  &gt;Silver is the best all-around germ fighter we have. Doctors are  &gt;reporting that&#44; taken internally&#44; it works against syphilis&#44; cholera&#44;  &gt;malaria&#44; diabetes and severe burns. (Bio/Tech News&#44; 1995)  &gt;If It&#8217;s good against strep A. Will it work for any other pathogen?  &gt;Look it up or try it. I saw a list somewhere of all 650 of them. I  &gt;reccomend collodial silver for anyone with a possible infection.  &gt;Chronic fatigue &#44; etc.&#44; etc  &gt;If you do try this&#44; make sure to eat &quot;active culture&quot; &nbsp;yogurt or take  &gt;a supplement. Supplents should already be on your list. good luck. God  &gt;bless. </p>
<p>Pyramids man. You need to check out the pyramids. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>&gt;I never said that collodial silver will cure your ailment. I will say  &gt;the following.  &gt;As an antibiotic&#44; Silver kills over 650 disease causing organisms;  &gt;resistant strains fail to develop. Silver is absolutely nontoxic. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t find this article&#44; however&#44; it becomes apparent that these are  _in vitro_ studies. &nbsp;Do you understand what MIC refers to?  &gt;Silver is the best all-around germ fighter we have. Doctors are </p>
<p>Based on your limited knowledge? &nbsp;Last we spoke&#44; you didn&#8217;t know what  MRSA&#44; VRE and the OrpD porin were. &nbsp;How can you make such statements  when you don&#8217;t have a fundamental understanding? &nbsp;  &gt;reporting that&#44; taken internally&#44; it works against syphilis&#44; cholera&#44;  &gt;malaria&#44; diabetes and severe burns. (Bio/Tech News&#44; 1995)  &gt;If It&#8217;s good against strep A. Will it work for any other pathogen?  &gt;Look it up or try it. I saw a list somewhere of all 650 of them. I  &gt;reccomend collodial silver for anyone with a possible infection.  &gt;Chronic fatigue &#44; etc.&#44; etc  &gt;If you do try this&#44; make sure to eat &quot;active culture&quot; &nbsp;yogurt or take  &gt;a supplement. Supplents should already be on your list. good luck. God  &gt;bless. </p>
<p>First&#44; you&#8217;re talking antibiotics and now probiotics. &nbsp;Does the  blessing excuse you for your various attacks on people whom simply ask  that you don&#8217;t crosspost and flame?  Brent&#44; It is time to pick up a 1st year text and start learning. &nbsp;  Darryl. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>On Tue&#44; 06 Apr 2004 17:13:27 -0400&#44; Darryl  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -&lt;umpol&#8230;@REMOVEhotmail.com&gt; wrote:  &gt;&gt;I never said that collodial silver will cure your ailment. I will say  &gt;&gt;the following.  &gt;&gt;As an antibiotic&#44; Silver kills over 650 disease causing organisms;  &gt;&gt;resistant strains fail to develop. Silver is absolutely nontoxic.  &gt;I can&#8217;t find this article&#44; however&#44; it becomes apparent that these are  &gt;_in vitro_ studies. &nbsp;Do you understand what MIC refers to?  &gt;&gt;Silver is the best all-around germ fighter we have. Doctors are  &gt;Based on your limited knowledge? &nbsp;Last we spoke&#44; you didn&#8217;t know what  &gt;MRSA&#44; VRE and the OrpD porin were. &nbsp;How can you make such statements  &gt;when you don&#8217;t have a fundamental understanding? &nbsp;  &gt;&gt;reporting that&#44; taken internally&#44; it works against syphilis&#44; cholera&#44;  &gt;&gt;malaria&#44; diabetes and severe burns. (Bio/Tech News&#44; 1995)  &gt;&gt;If It&#8217;s good against strep A. Will it work for any other pathogen?  &gt;&gt;Look it up or try it. I saw a list somewhere of all 650 of them. I  &gt;&gt;reccomend collodial silver for anyone with a possible infection.  &gt;&gt;Chronic fatigue &#44; etc.&#44; etc  &gt;&gt;If you do try this&#44; make sure to eat &quot;active culture&quot; &nbsp;yogurt or take  &gt;&gt;a supplement. Supplents should already be on your list. good luck. God  &gt;&gt;bless.  &gt;First&#44; you&#8217;re talking antibiotics and now probiotics. &nbsp;Does the  &gt;blessing excuse you for your various attacks on people whom simply ask  &gt;that you don&#8217;t crosspost and flame?  &gt;Brent&#44; It is time to pick up a 1st year text and start learning. &nbsp;  &gt;Darryl. </p>
<p>Appreciate the advice. Do you know what a reactive infection is?  Could it be possible you have one? </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>On Tue&#44; 06 Apr 2004 17:40:07 GMT&#44; &quot;Evelyn Ruut&quot;  &lt;mama-lion&#8230;@hvc.rr.com&gt; wrote:  &gt;Melodynamic&#44;  &gt;PLEASE be so kind as to remove alt.support.alzheimers from the headers when  &gt;you reply to this thread?  &gt;We&#8217;d appreciate it very much.  &gt;Thanks&#44;  &gt;Evelyn </p>
<p>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Melo probably forgot to. Alzheimers will do that. So will  smoking pot. Oh&#44; btw&#44; you can remove alt.drugs.pot as well&#44; because  we&#8217;ll forget your post by the time we read the sig line anyway. <img src='http://diabetestalking.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; BudBurner </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>&quot;Evelyn Ruut&quot; wrote:  &gt; PLEASE be so kind as to remove alt.support.alzheimers from the headers when  &gt; you reply to this thread?  &gt; We&#8217;d appreciate it very much. </p>
<p>Is this the &quot;royal we&quot; you&#8217;re using here?  Well&#44; you aren&#8217;t speaking for me (and others.)  I get a kick out of the silliness on this NG. &nbsp;If you only want dry&#44;  technical MS posts&#44; there are forums for that&#44; too.  Sylvia (&quot;we are amused&quot;) </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>On 7 Apr 2004 09:53:52 -0700&#44; Sylv772&#8230;@yahoo.com (Sylvia) wrote:  &gt;&quot;Evelyn Ruut&quot; wrote:  &gt;&gt; PLEASE be so kind as to remove alt.support.alzheimers from the headers when  &gt;&gt; you reply to this thread?  &gt;&gt; We&#8217;d appreciate it very much.  &gt;Is this the &quot;royal we&quot; you&#8217;re using here?  &gt;Well&#44; you aren&#8217;t speaking for me (and others.)  &gt;I get a kick out of the silliness on this NG. &nbsp;If you only want dry&#44;  &gt;technical MS posts&#44; there are forums for that&#44; too.  &gt;Sylvia (&quot;we are amused&quot;) </p>
<p>Watch Sylvia as I beg people to leave me alone. Thats amusing. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>In &lt;news:r7k87016m9ievt39fuhrgrpkt31jonkton@4ax.com&gt;&#44;  Dali said:  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -&gt; On 7 Apr 2004 09:53:52 -0700&#44; Sylv772&#8230;@yahoo.com (Sylvia) wrote:  &gt;&gt; &quot;Evelyn Ruut&quot; wrote:  &gt;&gt;&gt; PLEASE be so kind as to remove alt.support.alzheimers from the  &gt;&gt;&gt; headers when you reply to this thread?  &gt;&gt;&gt; We&#8217;d appreciate it very much.  &gt;&gt; Is this the &quot;royal we&quot; you&#8217;re using here?  &gt;&gt; Well&#44; you aren&#8217;t speaking for me (and others.)  &gt;&gt; I get a kick out of the silliness on this NG. &nbsp;If you only want dry&#44;  &gt;&gt; technical MS posts&#44; there are forums for that&#44; too.  &gt;&gt; Sylvia (&quot;we are amused&quot;)  &gt; Watch Sylvia as I beg people to leave me alone. Thats amusing. </p>
<p>What makes you think people will ever extend you the courtesy of leaving you  alone&#44; when you so steadfastly refuse to consider doing them the same  favour? &nbsp; You keep saying that you&#8217;re finished posting and you&#8217;re going  away&#44; but you never do.  You&#8217;re a lying&#44; whiny-assed little hypocrite&#44; Brent&#8230; and you&#8217;re a  particularly unimaginative and boring one&#44; at that.  ((U))  &nbsp; M </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>On Wed&#44; 7 Apr 2004 12:05:03 -0700&#44; &quot;Michael&quot; &lt;muirh&#8230;@haidagwaii.net&gt;  wrote:  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -&gt;In &lt;news:r7k87016m9ievt39fuhrgrpkt31jonkton@4ax.com&gt;&#44;  &gt;Dali said:  &gt;&gt; On 7 Apr 2004 09:53:52 -0700&#44; Sylv772&#8230;@yahoo.com (Sylvia) wrote:  &gt;&gt;&gt; &quot;Evelyn Ruut&quot; wrote:  &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; PLEASE be so kind as to remove alt.support.alzheimers from the  &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; headers when you reply to this thread?  &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; We&#8217;d appreciate it very much.  &gt;&gt;&gt; Is this the &quot;royal we&quot; you&#8217;re using here?  &gt;&gt;&gt; Well&#44; you aren&#8217;t speaking for me (and others.)  &gt;&gt;&gt; I get a kick out of the silliness on this NG. &nbsp;If you only want dry&#44;  &gt;&gt;&gt; technical MS posts&#44; there are forums for that&#44; too.  &gt;&gt;&gt; Sylvia (&quot;we are amused&quot;)  &gt;&gt; Watch Sylvia as I beg people to leave me alone. Thats amusing.  &gt;What makes you think people will ever extend you the courtesy of leaving you  &gt;alone&#44; when you so steadfastly refuse to consider doing them the same  &gt;favour? &nbsp; You keep saying that you&#8217;re finished posting and you&#8217;re going  &gt;away&#44; but you never do.  &gt;You&#8217;re a lying&#44; whiny-assed little hypocrite&#44; Brent&#8230; and you&#8217;re a  &gt;particularly unimaginative and boring one&#44; at that.  &gt;((U))  &gt; &nbsp;M </p>
<p>Have I made you mad? lmao. I&#8217;m going outside </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>In &lt;news:i7r870hf9cv4rpo6cjvdgv61ru02ju7hut@4ax.com&gt;&#44;  Dali said:  &gt; Have I made you mad? </p>
<p>Mad? &nbsp;You&#8217;re not worth the waste of energy.  I am disappointed&#44; though. &nbsp;You&#8217;re about as amusing as one of those  inflatable punching clowns with sand in its base.  ((U))  &nbsp; M </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>We are still waiting for your address MORON. Your Doctors detail?  But NO you are a foul mothed idiotic COWARD  Enjoy your GAME while you can because you will be hunted down. I know it will  take time but some of the best IT brains in the world are on your case. You  have been warned! </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>In &lt;news:20040407190529.05507.00000590@mb-m25.aol.com&gt;&#44;  BarryDdly said:  &gt; We are still waiting for your address MORON. Your Doctors detail?  &gt; But NO you are a foul mothed idiotic COWARD  &gt; Enjoy your GAME while you can because you will be hunted down. I know  &gt; it will take time but some of the best IT brains in the world are on  &gt; your case. You have been warned! </p>
<p>I already hunted him down months ago&#44; Dave. &nbsp;Took about 8 minutes. &nbsp;:-)  ((U))  &nbsp; M </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>On Wed&#44; 7 Apr 2004 17:31:28 -0700&#44; &quot;Michael&quot; &lt;muirh&#8230;@haidagwaii.net&gt;  wrote:  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -&gt;In &lt;news:20040407190529.05507.00000590@mb-m25.aol.com&gt;&#44;  &gt;BarryDdly said:  &gt;&gt; We are still waiting for your address MORON. Your Doctors detail?  &gt;&gt; But NO you are a foul mothed idiotic COWARD  &gt;&gt; Enjoy your GAME while you can because you will be hunted down. I know  &gt;&gt; it will take time but some of the best IT brains in the world are on  &gt;&gt; your case. You have been warned!  &gt;I already hunted him down months ago&#44; Dave. &nbsp;Took about 8 minutes. &nbsp;:-)  &gt;((U))  &gt; &nbsp;M </p>
<p>Dare I ask&#44; what did you do after you hunted him down?  Donn </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>In &lt;news:j98970t7t7r0pqcjumi28k4m8kbn29re22@4ax.com&gt;&#44;  d&#8230;@cheetah.net said:  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -&gt; On Wed&#44; 7 Apr 2004 17:31:28 -0700&#44; &quot;Michael&quot; &lt;muirh&#8230;@haidagwaii.net&gt;  &gt; wrote:  &gt;&gt; In &lt;news:20040407190529.05507.00000590@mb-m25.aol.com&gt;&#44;  &gt;&gt; BarryDdly said:  &gt;&gt;&gt; We are still waiting for your address MORON. Your Doctors detail?  &gt;&gt;&gt; But NO you are a foul mothed idiotic COWARD  &gt;&gt;&gt; Enjoy your GAME while you can because you will be hunted down. I  &gt;&gt;&gt; know it will take time but some of the best IT brains in the world  &gt;&gt;&gt; are on your case. You have been warned!  &gt;&gt; I already hunted him down months ago&#44; Dave. &nbsp;Took about 8 minutes.  &gt;&gt; <img src='http://diabetestalking.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   &gt;&gt; ((U))  &gt;&gt; &nbsp;M  &gt; Dare I ask&#44; what did you do after you hunted him down?  &gt; Donn </p>
<p>I published his address and telephone number right here in a.s.m-s &#8230; and I  willingly accepted the requisite heat for doing so.  Search Google for (borgers marathon specimen) if the details really matter.  ((U))  &nbsp; M </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>- Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -On Wed&#44; 07 Apr 2004 18:59:32 GMT&#44; Dali &lt;bre&#8230;@cya.net&gt; wrote:  &gt;On 7 Apr 2004 09:53:52 -0700&#44; Sylv772&#8230;@yahoo.com (Sylvia) wrote:  &gt;&gt;&quot;Evelyn Ruut&quot; wrote:  &gt;&gt;&gt; PLEASE be so kind as to remove alt.support.alzheimers from the headers when  &gt;&gt;&gt; you reply to this thread?  &gt;&gt;&gt; We&#8217;d appreciate it very much.  &gt;&gt;Is this the &quot;royal we&quot; you&#8217;re using here?  &gt;&gt;Well&#44; you aren&#8217;t speaking for me (and others.)  &gt;&gt;I get a kick out of the silliness on this NG. &nbsp;If you only want dry&#44;  &gt;&gt;technical MS posts&#44; there are forums for that&#44; too.  &gt;&gt;Sylvia (&quot;we are amused&quot;)  &gt;Watch Sylvia as I beg people to leave me alone. Thats amusing. </p>
<p>Dali&#44;  GO AWAY  Try alt.support.mult-sclerosis.alternatives  nobody uses it and you can post your non scientific  snake oil cures all you like.  I THOUGHT YOU PROMISED TO NOT COME BACK  TO THIS NG.  YOU ARE A BAREFACED LIAR TOO&#8230;&#8230;.  GO AWAY  PLEASE  NBD </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/collodial-silver-2477846.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MHD</title>
		<link>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/mhd-1480920.html</link>
		<comments>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/mhd-1480920.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diabetes Cure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diabetestalking.com/uncategorized/mhd-1480920.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
 MHD  I am sorry for upsetting your group but I still feel Charles is not the  Christian he said he was and he is my only enemy and no one else is. Charles  you are a hypocrite and you know it. You only care about your own beliefs  and ideas. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p> MHD  I am sorry for upsetting your group but I still feel Charles is not the  Christian he said he was and he is my only enemy and no one else is. Charles  you are a hypocrite and you know it. You only care about your own beliefs  and ideas. I am glad you were not my daughters Sunday School teacher because  I reared her not to be a bigot like people like you. I pity you Charles&#44;  with your health conditions you told me you have you should walk the narrow  path better than you are. I don&#8217;t apologize for anything said to you but to  the rest of MHD I won&#8217;t bother your group again. </p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t CHARLES group&#44; but if you feel that you no longer wish to  participate&#44; then that&#8217;s Ok.  I thought I might learn  something here but I am done with newsgroups. </p>
<p>Would this be because you didn&#8217;t get the full support of the masses I  wonder? If so&#44; then I&#8217;d say you&#8217;re right and that newsgroups aren&#8217;t for  you.  I wanted to make friends but I  found out the internet is not the place. </p>
<p>It was for a lot of us.   Thanks to the ones who have  supported me. Yes Ted you are a very sweet person to me and I love you for  that. You hang in there Ted and things will get better. </p>
<p>Which Ted is this?  Beav </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>MHD  I am sorry for upsetting your group but I still feel Charles is not the  Christian he said he was and he is my only enemy and no one else is. Charles  you are a hypocrite and you know it. You only care about your own beliefs  and ideas. I am glad you were not my daughters Sunday School teacher because  I reared her not to be a bigot like people like you. I pity you Charles&#44;  with your health conditions you told me you have you should walk the narrow  path better than you are. I don&#8217;t apologize for anything said to you but to  the rest of MHD I won&#8217;t bother your group again. I thought I might learn  something here but I am done with newsgroups. I wanted to make friends but I  found out the internet is not the place. Thanks to the ones who have  supported me. Yes Ted you are a very sweet person to me and I love you for  that. You hang in there Ted and things will get better.  Diana  &#8212;  May You Live Today By How You Want  To Be Remembered Tomorrow </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>   From Guy Williams   &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A lot us have been following this   group for years. &nbsp;WE can expect a certain of   posting from some of our people. &nbsp;This is not   a problem for me. &nbsp;I know all of the people   would come to aid me if I needed and asked   for it. </p>
<p>The personalities may be diverse&#44; our behaviour predictable&#44;  but we rally when the chips are down. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>From Guy Williams  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A lot us have been following this  group for years. &nbsp;WE can expect a certain of  posting from some of our people. &nbsp;This is not  a problem for me. &nbsp;I know all of the people  would come to aid me if I needed and asked  for it. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>This group was initiated to inform people about diabetes.  At that time I was suffering and did not know squat about  my problem. &nbsp; When I found MHD it was like it was getting  daylight. &nbsp; It was formed by some very special people.  A few are still around still helping. &nbsp; When we get too far  off on a tangent we must try to remember why we are here.  Technical words are to define&#44; not to impress. &nbsp;Using them  to snow a diabetic is improper. They are used for selling  to fool the syckers. &nbsp;They have a place&#44; &nbsp;if used at  the proper place and in the proper setting. .  When I see a person come here confused and  very distressed&#44; then flower nto a wonderful  poster with positive contributions&#44; I feel great  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Guy. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>A few weeks back I was at a health food se and the owner was talking to  me about restreing my eyesight with some herb or other. Her intent  wasn&#8217;t exactly to sell me something from her store&#44; she was quite  curious&#44; and as we talked&#44; I discovered she didn&#8217;t know squat about  retinopathy. She was not like some of the spammers we get here&#44; but was  trying to understand and help me. It escalated in to an argument. A  rather strong one&#44; as she was convinced she would be able to regrow the  part of my retina that is damaged&#44; and prevent further bleeding in my  eyes. Partly because of this group&#44; i uave gotten enough knowledge about  the cause and effect of this eye disease and m opthal assured me that  once the retina detaches&#44; that&#8217;s it &#8230; game over. &nbsp;This lady would not  let it go&#44; and shewas following me around the store&#44; and was absolutely  convinced&#44; maybe due to her training as an herbalist&#44; and partly due to  ignorance&#44; that she really believed that she could restore my ruined  sight. Now&#44; I don;t know owyou feel about this&#44; but wouldn&#8217;t you think  that if this were possible&#44; that some caring doc would gladly hand these  things out. If it was so simple and all we had to do was to buy this  herb to see&#44; how many grateful people flock to that store to get  treated. My God&#44; the grateful hordes that would appear ! And how cruel  is it to make this kind of claim&#44; to a person already in trouble. Just  like Jack with a hand full of magic beans&#44; huh ?  I was in the store buying something else&#44; and here is this woman telling  me she is capable of curing my problem&#44; with a $10 bottle of an herb.  When she wouldn&#8217;t let it go&#44; I got angry and told her off. Told her how  cruel it was to keep this ability she has to cure blindness. We will not  be shopping in her store anymore. It&#8217;s closer to my house than the only  other store&#44; but I&#8217;ll be taking the bus to the other one now. Just like  the vitamin store for body builders right by my house. One lady who  works there is convinced that some preparation they sell will cure  diabetes. The difference between this lady and the other&#44; is that this  lady is just a fast talking saleswoman. Shs no more believes this crap  than flying to the moon&#44; She is just looking for her commission.  The unabashed cruelty of telling people that this or that preparation  will fix or restore a medical problem&#44; is so huge that it just boggles  my mind. And people should really know better&#44; that if any of this was  real&#44; we&#8217;d all be doing it&#44; right ? In contrast&#44; the other health food  place i go to&#44; does not promote anything they sell as a cure. They  mainly have real food stuffs and prepackagd healthy snacks and  supplements. They do have the usual number of remedies and packaged  herbs and so forth&#44; but these guys never push it. They&#8217;ll fix you up  with a wheatgrass drink at the juice bar ( very poplar there )&#44; but they  don&#8217;t pretend to be God. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Anyone who reads this group  on a continuing basis&#44; know bett. I think we all have a responsibility  to continue to make sure others don&#8217;t get scammed by people who only  want money. I. for one&#44; know the desperation of finding a way to deal  with my diminishing sight&#44; and eating some pill that might not even  really be a certain herb or anything other than a placebo&#44; might be  attractive in a desperate moment. But we know these things won;t work.  Some people will try the latest &quot;witch doctor&quot;.  I have a really good idea&#44; ( she said sarcastically ) it might be unique  to some. Invest all your time and money in to good education&#44; a gym  membership and the best food and med you can. Find an acceptable doc.  Most people want a quick fix and there isn&#8217;t one. And some people want  to believe all that mumbo gumbo the spammer scammers blab. I personally  wouldn&#8217;t give any creedence to anyone telling me that some magic pill  will care anything. At least I know I a not going to hell with a pocket  full of money I stole from hopeful desperate folks !  Rainbow &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/mhd-1480920.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diabetes Patients: See for yourself why it&#039;s called &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&quot;</title>
		<link>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/diabetes-patients-see-for-yourself-why-its-called-the-greatest-vitamin-in-the-world-1464648.html</link>
		<comments>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/diabetes-patients-see-for-yourself-why-its-called-the-greatest-vitamin-in-the-world-1464648.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diabetes Cure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diabetestalking.com/uncategorized/diabetes-patients-see-for-yourself-why-its-called-the-greatest-vitamin-in-the-world-1464648.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
   I was thinking of a pair of sugar-free black pumps. 
Pumps? &#160;I didn&#8217;t know you used insulin! &#160;Hehe!  &#8212;  Type 2  http://users.bestweb.net/~jbove/ 

Response:
 You will never want to take a synthetic vitamin again.  &#34;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&#34; nutritionally supports people with  weight loss issues&#44; stress&#44; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>   I was thinking of a pair of sugar-free black pumps. </p>
<p>Pumps? &nbsp;I didn&#8217;t know you used insulin! &nbsp;Hehe!  &#8212;  Type 2  http://users.bestweb.net/~jbove/ </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> You will never want to take a synthetic vitamin again.  &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&quot; nutritionally supports people with  weight loss issues&#44; stress&#44; digestion/indigestion problems&#44; blood  sugar level/diabetes&#44; among a host of others. &nbsp;&quot;The Greatest Vitamin  in the World&quot; is endorsed by the NBCCA representing most teams in the  NBA. It also has the Gold seal award for using only the highest grade  and most absorbable nutrients known to man.  For more information and the absolute lowest prices on the &#8216;net for  &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&#44;&quot; go to: </p>
<p>interesting that the NBA was not pleased when they were informed about  this fraud.  Mack  Type 1 since 1975  http://www.alt-support-diabetes.org  http://www.insulin-pumpers.org  &nbsp;In tribute to the United States of America and the State  &nbsp;of Israel&#44; two bastions of strength in a world filled with strife and  &nbsp;terrorism. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Have you read that stuff lately about the &quot;toe cleavage&quot; operations women  have to get their feet to fit in designer shoes. I really thought I&#8217;d heard  it all. But there was a topper&#44; calf (as in leg) operations for men. I think  the end is near.  &#8212;  &#8212;  t2_lurking  geabbottATabbottandabbottDOTcom  Do not mail to t2_lurking (auto-delete)  Well&#44; i dreamed i saw the silver  Space ships flying  In the yellow haze of the sun  &#8212; Neil Young &#8212; </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; I was thinking of a pair of sugar-free black pumps.   c    Maybe if you buy &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&quot; you will be safe    no matter what kind of shoes you buy. I am quite sure you don&#8217;t really    need new shoes to begin with though.    Sleepy    What type of shoes??????    I&#8217;m going shopping tomorrow and need to know!    <img src='http://diabetestalking.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />     c     You will never want to take a synthetic vitamin again.     &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&quot; nutritionally supports people  with     weight loss issues&#44; stress&#44; digestion/indigestion problems&#44; blood     sugar level/diabetes&#44; among a host of others. &nbsp;&quot;The Greatest Vitamin     in the World&quot; is endorsed by the NBCCA representing most teams in  the     NBA. It also has the Gold seal award for using only the highest  grade     and most absorbable nutrients known to man.     For more information and the absolute lowest prices on the &#8216;net for     &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&#44;&quot; go to:     The burning question of the hour is&#44; will it cure diabetes that is     caused by wearing shoes?     SM     You can tell those republicans sure do like the poor folks&#44;     They just keep helping create more and more of them!    You can tell those republicans sure do like the poor folks&#44;    They just keep helping create more and more of them!  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>&nbsp; He thinks we&#8217;re suckers&#8230;  &nbsp; &nbsp; Who want to buy his snake oil&#8230;  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; And his stupid scam.  &#8212;  I hate spam&#44; but that isn&#8217;t really part of my email  address. &nbsp;Remove the string &quot;HatesSpam&quot; from this email  Ever wonder what it&#8217;d be like to be a blood-sucking parasite?  http://tinyurl.com/7wxk </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>I was thinking of a pair of sugar-free black pumps.  c </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; Maybe if you buy &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&quot; you will be safe   no matter what kind of shoes you buy. I am quite sure you don&#8217;t really   need new shoes to begin with though.   Sleepy   What type of shoes??????   I&#8217;m going shopping tomorrow and need to know!   <img src='http://diabetestalking.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />    c    You will never want to take a synthetic vitamin again.    &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&quot; nutritionally supports people with    weight loss issues&#44; stress&#44; digestion/indigestion problems&#44; blood    sugar level/diabetes&#44; among a host of others. &nbsp;&quot;The Greatest Vitamin    in the World&quot; is endorsed by the NBCCA representing most teams in the    NBA. It also has the Gold seal award for using only the highest grade    and most absorbable nutrients known to man.    For more information and the absolute lowest prices on the &#8216;net for    &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&#44;&quot; go to:    The burning question of the hour is&#44; will it cure diabetes that is    caused by wearing shoes?    SM    You can tell those republicans sure do like the poor folks&#44;    They just keep helping create more and more of them!   You can tell those republicans sure do like the poor folks&#44;   They just keep helping create more and more of them!  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> You will never want to take a synthetic vitamin again. </p>
<p>And of course&#44; it&#8217;s a pyramid scheme&#44; where the &quot;affiliate&quot; gets credit for  your web orders&#8230;. you can&#8217;t access the page without specifying an  affiliate.  The throwaway account at google seems to have gone away&#8230;  Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request&#44; or at www.albany.net/~gwoods  Zone 5/6 in upstate New York&#44; 1200&#8242; elevation. NY WO G </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Maybe if you buy &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&quot; you will be safe  no matter what kind of shoes you buy. I am quite sure you don&#8217;t really  need new shoes to begin with though.  Sleepy  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -What type of shoes??????  I&#8217;m going shopping tomorrow and need to know!  <img src='http://diabetestalking.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   c   You will never want to take a synthetic vitamin again.   &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&quot; nutritionally supports people with   weight loss issues&#44; stress&#44; digestion/indigestion problems&#44; blood   sugar level/diabetes&#44; among a host of others. &nbsp;&quot;The Greatest Vitamin   in the World&quot; is endorsed by the NBCCA representing most teams in the   NBA. It also has the Gold seal award for using only the highest grade   and most absorbable nutrients known to man.   For more information and the absolute lowest prices on the &#8216;net for   &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&#44;&quot; go to:   The burning question of the hour is&#44; will it cure diabetes that is   caused by wearing shoes?   SM   You can tell those republicans sure do like the poor folks&#44;   They just keep helping create more and more of them! </p>
<p> You can tell those republicans sure do like the poor folks&#44;  They just keep helping create more and more of them! </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>What type of shoes??????  I&#8217;m going shopping tomorrow and need to know!  <img src='http://diabetestalking.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   c </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  You will never want to take a synthetic vitamin again.   &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&quot; nutritionally supports people with   weight loss issues&#44; stress&#44; digestion/indigestion problems&#44; blood   sugar level/diabetes&#44; among a host of others. &nbsp;&quot;The Greatest Vitamin   in the World&quot; is endorsed by the NBCCA representing most teams in the   NBA. It also has the Gold seal award for using only the highest grade   and most absorbable nutrients known to man.   For more information and the absolute lowest prices on the &#8216;net for   &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&#44;&quot; go to:   The burning question of the hour is&#44; will it cure diabetes that is   caused by wearing shoes?   SM   You can tell those republicans sure do like the poor folks&#44;   They just keep helping create more and more of them!  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> You will never want to take a synthetic vitamin again.  &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&quot; nutritionally supports people with  weight loss issues&#44; stress&#44; digestion/indigestion problems&#44; blood  sugar level/diabetes&#44; among a host of others. &nbsp;&quot;The Greatest Vitamin  in the World&quot; is endorsed by the NBCCA representing most teams in the  NBA. It also has the Gold seal award for using only the highest grade  and most absorbable nutrients known to man.  For more information and the absolute lowest prices on the &#8216;net for  &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&#44;&quot; go to: </p>
<p>The burning question of the hour is&#44; will it cure diabetes that is  caused by wearing shoes?  SM  You can tell those republicans sure do like the poor folks&#44;  They just keep helping create more and more of them! </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  You will never want to take a synthetic vitamin again.  &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&quot; nutritionally supports people with  weight loss issues&#44; stress&#44; digestion/indigestion problems&#44; blood  sugar level/diabetes&#44; among a host of others. &nbsp;&quot;The Greatest Vitamin  For more information and the absolute lowest prices on the &#8216;net for  &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&#44;&quot; go to:   &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;http://www.psychopath-research.com/whatis_psycho_1.html </p>
<p>You spelled the URL wrong. &nbsp;Don&#8217;t worry&#44; &nbsp;I fixed it.  Regards  &nbsp; Old Al </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>You will never want to take a synthetic vitamin again.  &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&quot; nutritionally supports people with  weight loss issues&#44; stress&#44; digestion/indigestion problems&#44; blood  sugar level/diabetes&#44; among a host of others. &nbsp;&quot;The Greatest Vitamin  in the World&quot; is endorsed by the NBCCA representing most teams in the  NBA. It also has the Gold seal award for using only the highest grade  and most absorbable nutrients known to man.  For more information and the absolute lowest prices on the &#8216;net for  &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&#44;&quot; go to:  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; www.dontforgettotakeyourvitamins.com/spivak29919 </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Guess you will make some hits. Spammers depend on  this. &nbsp; Here most of the people are fairly educated in  diabetes and you will not fare well here.  you could use some lessons in morality and the  attributes of a person that exploits sick people.  Go away  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -You will never want to take a synthetic vitamin again.  &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&quot; nutritionally supports people with  weight loss issues&#44; stress&#44; digestion/indigestion problems&#44; blood  sugar level/diabetes&#44; among a host of others. &nbsp;&quot;The Greatest Vitamin  in the World&quot; is endorsed by the NBCCA representing most teams in the  NBA. It also has the Gold seal award for using only the highest grade  and most absorbable nutrients known to man.  For more information and the absolute lowest prices on the &#8216;net for  &quot;The Greatest Vitamin in the World&#44;&quot; go to:   &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;www.dontforgettotakeyourvitamins.com/spivak29919  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/diabetes-patients-see-for-yourself-why-its-called-the-greatest-vitamin-in-the-world-1464648.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FREE tips on dealing with stress, eating well, recipies and more!</title>
		<link>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/free-tips-on-dealing-with-stress.html</link>
		<comments>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/free-tips-on-dealing-with-stress.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diabetes Cure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diabetestalking.com/uncategorized/free-tips-on-dealing-with-stress.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
 Yes&#44; I realize that I placed multiple listings and was afraid that it may  appear as SPAM. However&#44; my reply should indicate that it is not and that  the contents of the website&#44; that I am so excited about&#44; is genuine. 
You just happen to be sponsored by a huge Life Insurance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p> Yes&#44; I realize that I placed multiple listings and was afraid that it may  appear as SPAM. However&#44; my reply should indicate that it is not and that  the contents of the website&#44; that I am so excited about&#44; is genuine. </p>
<p>You just happen to be sponsored by a huge Life Insurance Company. Fer  Shere Dude.  SM  Why Can&#8217;t I Tickle Myself? </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> -0500:  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;   This is a multi-part message in MIME format.   Why not learn how to post on newsgroups properly?    Want to Feel Healthier?    We are a multi-partnered project   A whit? &nbsp;Since when have projects had &quot;partners&quot;?    at Lakehead University in Thunder Bay ON&#44; Canada.   Never heard of it. &nbsp;Since when have academic project participants been   posting anonymously and using hotmail addresses?    Overseen by a team of researchers and health experts&#44; we are    dedicated to the prevention of disease and the promotion of health.   Pull the other one! &nbsp;You&#8217;re a spammer&#44; plain and simple&#44; as nasty and   money-grabbing as any other. &nbsp;Kindly go forth and procreate.   Yes&#44; I realize that I placed multiple listings and was afraid that it   may appear as SPAM. However&#44; my reply should indicate that it is not   and that the contents of the website&#44; that I am so excited about&#44; is   genuine.   This is a multi-partner project&#44; the website was put together with   input from individuals of many different organizations (click on &quot;meet   the team&quot; to see who).   Never heard of Lakehead University? Check out Lakehead&#8217;s website   www.lakeheadu.ca </p>
<p>OK. &nbsp;Would I find there evidence of your connection with the University?   Finally&#44; nowhere on the www.successfulaging.ca website are we or will   we ask for money. To use the resources of the website you do not have   to sign-up or leave your email. I to am aware of SPAM&#44; which is why I   refuse to leave my personal email in newsgroups. But rest assured&#44; I   last &quot;m&quot;).   With the current resources&#44; this is the only way to let people know   about the website on a global scale. </p>
<p>You mean&#44; you regard your website as important enough to abuse our (and  other) newsgroups with off-topic advertising for it? &nbsp;How is this not  spam? &nbsp;Perhaps we don&#8217;t quite share your perceptions about your  importance&#44; and are less than happy about posts which violate the  charters of our newsgroups&#44; and dilute their value.   It is easy to criticize in a world of deceit&#44; but one must be careful   not to overgeneralize to those who are here for good intentions. &nbsp;Peter   Brink&#44; Thunder Bay&#44; ON&#44; Canada </p>
<p>OK&#44; Peter&#44; thanks for your name. &nbsp;But really&#44; if your project were a  scientific one&#44; I&#8217;d be looking for details of your department&#44;  supervisor&#8217;s name&#44; aim of research&#44; and so forth&#44; simply as a token of  good faith. &nbsp;And phrases like &quot;Want to feal healthier?&quot; and &quot;I am so  excited about it&quot; and &quot;we are a multi-partnered project&quot; don&#8217;t exactly  suggest scientific motivation.  &#8212;  Alan Mackenzie (Munich&#44; Germany)  (like &quot;aa&quot;)&#44; remove half of them (leaving&#44; say&#44; &quot;a&quot;). </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  Can you grab his advisor&#8217;s name&#44; or the department at Lakehead U.? Most   universities forbid any form of spam&#44; and their personnel department/IT   department/deans would be pretty angry about this sort of behavior. </p>
<p>I searched the Lakehead University website and came up with this news  release. Go to http://www.lakeheadu.ca/~eventswww/successfulaging.html  and you&#8217;ll find the news release along with names of contacts. I&#8217;m  sure the folks at Lakehead U &nbsp;would be interested in knowing that  someone is abusing the newsgroups in their good name. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>    OK&#44; Peter&#44; thanks for your name. &nbsp;But really&#44; if your project were a    scientific one&#44; I&#8217;d be looking for details of your department&#44;    supervisor&#8217;s name&#44; aim of research&#44; and so forth&#44; simply as a token of    good faith. &nbsp;And phrases like &quot;Want to feal healthier?&quot; and &quot;I am so    excited about it&quot; and &quot;we are a multi-partnered project&quot; don&#8217;t exactly    suggest scientific motivation.   The project and its connection with Lakehead U. seem legit. The   project is partly funded by Manulife Financial- an insurance company   with a special interest in keeping the Canadian population healthy.   Perhaps Peter has a relationship with Manulife? That might explain his   excitement. It&#8217;s no excuse to spam the newsgroups with cross-posts   though. </p>
<p>Also. cross-posting is vastly&#44; vastly preferable to sending the same thing  individually to all the different groups and making people who happen to  follow different groups read it again&#44; and again&#44; and again. But failing to  correctly set a &quot;Followup-To:&quot; is grounds for flensing him with wet  spaghetti.  And again&#44; it really smells like a miracle-cure-spam-scam from the format  and style. It may even be in use to gather addresses to spam people&#44; which  seems a common use for semi-vaguely-legitimate website forms these days. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> Not X Posted to SEVEN groups  The project and its connection with Lakehead U. seem legit. The  project is partly funded by Manulife Financial- an insurance company  with a special interest in keeping the Canadian population healthy. </p>
<p>Dead people don&#8217;t pay premiums. This is no small company keeping  Canadians healthy. They just bought John Hancock Insurance Co. Perhaps  you have heard of them.  Perhaps Peter has a relationship with Manulife? That might explain his  excitement. It&#8217;s no excuse to spam the newsgroups with cross-posts  though.  D. Monk </p>
<p>Sleepy  If you think nobody cares&#44; try missing a couple of  payments. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>    OK&#44; Peter&#44; thanks for your name. &nbsp;But really&#44; if your project were a    scientific one&#44; I&#8217;d be looking for details of your department&#44;    supervisor&#8217;s name&#44; aim of research&#44; and so forth&#44; simply as a token of    good faith. &nbsp;And phrases like &quot;Want to feal healthier?&quot; and &quot;I am so    excited about it&quot; and &quot;we are a multi-partnered project&quot; don&#8217;t exactly    suggest scientific motivation.   The project and its connection with Lakehead U. seem legit. The   project is partly funded by Manulife Financial- an insurance company   with a special interest in keeping the Canadian population healthy.   Perhaps Peter has a relationship with Manulife? That might explain his   excitement. It&#8217;s no excuse to spam the newsgroups with cross-posts   though. </p>
<p>Can you grab his advisor&#8217;s name&#44; or the department at Lakehead U.? Most  universities forbid any form of spam&#44; and their personnel department/IT  department/deans would be pretty angry about this sort of behavior. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  OK&#44; Peter&#44; thanks for your name. &nbsp;But really&#44; if your project were a   scientific one&#44; I&#8217;d be looking for details of your department&#44;   supervisor&#8217;s name&#44; aim of research&#44; and so forth&#44; simply as a token of   good faith. &nbsp;And phrases like &quot;Want to feal healthier?&quot; and &quot;I am so   excited about it&quot; and &quot;we are a multi-partnered project&quot; don&#8217;t exactly   suggest scientific motivation. </p>
<p>The project and its connection with Lakehead U. seem legit. The  project is partly funded by Manulife Financial- an insurance company  with a special interest in keeping the Canadian population healthy.  Perhaps Peter has a relationship with Manulife? That might explain his  excitement. It&#8217;s no excuse to spam the newsgroups with cross-posts  though.  D. Monk </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>When I see the word &quot;free&quot; or &quot;cure&quot; I do not read those posts.  Diabetes is not a trivial matter to us. In addition to diabetes we are  plagued by people and organizations trying to get what money  we have left. &nbsp; Most are very good sales people but basically  trying to make a easy buck. &nbsp;  We do not need or want that type.  Most people here are aware of the problem and you will not find many  here that are dumb enough to buy some line. &nbsp; If anyone that buys into  these claims that use the internet for free advertising has no need  for this group. They need education on how salesmen works to get  easy money. &nbsp;  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text -Yes&#44; I realize that I placed multiple listings and was afraid that it may  appear as SPAM. However&#44; my reply should indicate that it is not and that  the contents of the website&#44; that I am so excited about&#44; is genuine.  This is a multi-partner project&#44; the website was put together with input  from individuals of many different organizations (click on &quot;meet the team&quot;  to see who).  Never heard of Lakehead University? Check out Lakehead&#8217;s website  www.lakeheadu.ca  Finally&#44; nowhere on the www.successfulaging.ca website are we or will we ask  for money. To use the resources of the website you do not have to sign-up or  leave your email. I to am aware of SPAM&#44; which is why I refuse to leave my  personal email in newsgroups. But rest assured&#44; I will answer any email sent  With the current resources&#44; this is the only way to let people know about  the website on a global scale.  It is easy to criticize in a world of deceit&#44; but one must be careful not to  overgeneralize to those who are here for good intentions.  Peter Brink&#44; Thunder Bay&#44; ON&#44; Canada    This is a multi-part message in MIME format.   Why not learn how to post on newsgroups properly?    Want to Feel Healthier?    We are a multi-partnered project   A whit? &nbsp;Since when have projects had &quot;partners&quot;?    at Lakehead University in Thunder Bay ON&#44; Canada.   Never heard of it. &nbsp;Since when have academic project participants been   posting anonymously and using hotmail addresses?    Overseen by a team of researchers and health experts&#44; we are    dedicated to the prevention of disease and the promotion of health.   Pull the other one! &nbsp;You&#8217;re a spammer&#44; plain and simple&#44; as nasty and   money-grabbing as any other. &nbsp;Kindly go forth and procreate.   &#8212;   Alan Mackenzie (Munich&#44; Germany)   (like &quot;aa&quot;)&#44; remove half of them (leaving&#44; say&#44; &quot;a&quot;).  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Well&#44; I LOOKED at your web site  full of feel-good trash  has anyone in your organization ever REASON a study?  it does not look like it  You are publishing references to PRESS reports about articles (NOT  STUDIES) which are NOT definitive..  In most cases&#44; the press report is taken from a press release written bu  a flack who has no concept of the problem&#44;  AND&#44; most important&#44; someone writes a letter to JAMA or NEJM&#44; or LANCET&#44;  which says &quot;in my opinion&#44; the sun comes up in the west&quot;&#44; and the wire  report says &nbsp;&quot; Researchers prove sun comes up in the west&#44; a study by  Hopkins&#44; published in&#8230;.&quot;  THEN&#44; some twit like you QUOTES IT as FACT. &nbsp;Ignoring ALL the other  evidence.  To point out just ONE item&#44; you are trumpeting that Hopkins says you  should take vitim for Macular Edema- I GO to Hopkins&#44; for Macular Edema  &#8211; in ALL the years I have gone there&#44; I have NEVER been told to use any  &quot;supplements&quot; or &quot;vitimnes&quot;&#44; and I go to one of the top people there. &#8211;  ALSO&#44; you ignore the fact that the FDA advises people NOT to take the  stuff. &nbsp;and there are LOTS of studies in Medline showing why you shouldn&#8217;t.  Most of your other factoids are questionable&#44; at best &#8211; but the SOUND  like you have a clue.  THEN&#44; you SPAM the newsgroups with your &quot;informational site&quot; it IS spam  &#8211; even if it is &quot;non commercial&quot;  PLEASE go away  &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  Yes&#44; I realize that I placed multiple listings and was afraid that it may   appear as SPAM. However&#44; my reply should indicate that it is not and that   the contents of the website&#44; that I am so excited about&#44; is genuine.   This is a multi-partner project&#44; the website was put together with input   from individuals of many different organizations (click on &quot;meet the team&quot;   to see who).   Never heard of Lakehead University? Check out Lakehead&#8217;s website   www.lakeheadu.ca   Finally&#44; nowhere on the www.successfulaging.ca website are we or will we ask   for money. To use the resources of the website you do not have to sign-up or   leave your email. I to am aware of SPAM&#44; which is why I refuse to leave my   personal email in newsgroups. But rest assured&#44; I will answer any email sent   With the current resources&#44; this is the only way to let people know about   the website on a global scale.   It is easy to criticize in a world of deceit&#44; but one must be careful not to   overgeneralize to those who are here for good intentions.   Peter Brink&#44; Thunder Bay&#44; ON&#44; Canada  This is a multi-part message in MIME format.  Why not learn how to post on newsgroups properly?  Want to Feel Healthier?  We are a multi-partnered project  A whit? &nbsp;Since when have projects had &quot;partners&quot;?  at Lakehead University in Thunder Bay ON&#44; Canada.  Never heard of it. &nbsp;Since when have academic project participants been  posting anonymously and using hotmail addresses?  Overseen by a team of researchers and health experts&#44; we are  dedicated to the prevention of disease and the promotion of health.  Pull the other one! &nbsp;You&#8217;re a spammer&#44; plain and simple&#44; as nasty and  money-grabbing as any other. &nbsp;Kindly go forth and procreate.  &#8212;  Alan Mackenzie (Munich&#44; Germany)  (like &quot;aa&quot;)&#44; remove half of them (leaving&#44; say&#44; &quot;a&quot;).  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Yes&#44; I realize that I placed multiple listings and was afraid that it may  appear as SPAM. However&#44; my reply should indicate that it is not and that  the contents of the website&#44; that I am so excited about&#44; is genuine.  This is a multi-partner project&#44; the website was put together with input  from individuals of many different organizations (click on &quot;meet the team&quot;  to see who).  Never heard of Lakehead University? Check out Lakehead&#8217;s website  www.lakeheadu.ca  Finally&#44; nowhere on the www.successfulaging.ca website are we or will we ask  for money. To use the resources of the website you do not have to sign-up or  leave your email. I to am aware of SPAM&#44; which is why I refuse to leave my  personal email in newsgroups. But rest assured&#44; I will answer any email sent  With the current resources&#44; this is the only way to let people know about  the website on a global scale.  It is easy to criticize in a world of deceit&#44; but one must be careful not to  overgeneralize to those who are here for good intentions.  Peter Brink&#44; Thunder Bay&#44; ON&#44; Canada </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;   This is a multi-part message in MIME format.   Why not learn how to post on newsgroups properly?    Want to Feel Healthier?    We are a multi-partnered project   A whit? &nbsp;Since when have projects had &quot;partners&quot;?    at Lakehead University in Thunder Bay ON&#44; Canada.   Never heard of it. &nbsp;Since when have academic project participants been   posting anonymously and using hotmail addresses?    Overseen by a team of researchers and health experts&#44; we are    dedicated to the prevention of disease and the promotion of health.   Pull the other one! &nbsp;You&#8217;re a spammer&#44; plain and simple&#44; as nasty and   money-grabbing as any other. &nbsp;Kindly go forth and procreate.   &#8212;   Alan Mackenzie (Munich&#44; Germany)   (like &quot;aa&quot;)&#44; remove half of them (leaving&#44; say&#44; &quot;a&quot;).  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  This is a multi-part message in MIME format. </p>
<p>Why not learn how to post on newsgroups properly?   Want to Feel Healthier?   We are a multi-partnered project </p>
<p>A whit? &nbsp;Since when have projects had &quot;partners&quot;?   at Lakehead University in Thunder Bay ON&#44; Canada. </p>
<p>Never heard of it. &nbsp;Since when have academic project participants been  posting anonymously and using hotmail addresses?   Overseen by a team of researchers and health experts&#44; we are   dedicated to the prevention of disease and the promotion of health. </p>
<p>Pull the other one! &nbsp;You&#8217;re a spammer&#44; plain and simple&#44; as nasty and  money-grabbing as any other. &nbsp;Kindly go forth and procreate.  &#8212;  Alan Mackenzie (Munich&#44; Germany)  (like &quot;aa&quot;)&#44; remove half of them (leaving&#44; say&#44; &quot;a&quot;). </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Want to Feel Healthier?  We are a multi-partnered project at Lakehead University in Thunder Bay ON&#44; Canada. Overseen by a team of researchers and health experts&#44; we are dedicated to the prevention of disease and the promotion of health.  We offer a free and simple health Quiz that lets you assess your own health &#8211; it gives you immediate feedback!  www.successfulaging.ca  Everything on this website is FREE. When you fill out the quiz&#44; the information you enter is completely confidential and remains confidential through the rules and regulations governed by the ethics board at Lakehead University.  You also do not have to wait for the results&#44; the results are beamed back to you in the blink of an eye. It is a wonderful quiz created by wonderful people.  In the website there is also a weight watcher system. It is similar to other systems with the exception of one feature&#44; ITS FREE. You can track your weight month by month and feel proud of the results.  This website is the result of years of research and education and is provided to you at no cost&#44; EVER! </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/free-tips-on-dealing-with-stress.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Theory about carbs and exercise</title>
		<link>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/theory-about-carbs-and-exercise-2155050.html</link>
		<comments>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/theory-about-carbs-and-exercise-2155050.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diabetes Cure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diabetestalking.com/uncategorized/theory-about-carbs-and-exercise-2155050.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:
- Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  Hi&#44;   I&#8217;ve got a theory and was wondering if it&#8217;s true or if anyone else has   thought about this before. &#160;You may rememember a few weeks ago&#44; I said I   noticed that I could eat many more carbs&#44; since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Question:</strong></h4>
<p>- Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  Hi&#44;   I&#8217;ve got a theory and was wondering if it&#8217;s true or if anyone else has   thought about this before. &nbsp;You may rememember a few weeks ago&#44; I said I   noticed that I could eat many more carbs&#44; since I started exercising &#8212;   and still stay in ketosis.   Well&#44; here&#8217;s my theory&#8230;.   Assuming:   -My treadmill says I just burned 200 calories.   -Carbs are used as fuel before anything else (except alcohol &#8212; but I had   no alcohol.)   -1 gram of carbs works out to 4 calories.   -I just ate something with about 50 grams of carbs in it   Then:   Did I just burn ALL (50&#215;4=200) of those carbs off?   Is there something wrong in my logic? &nbsp;Is that not the way the body   works?   If this is true&#44; then could I eat somthing with 100 grams of carbs and   then work out and burn 400 calories and be done with it.   I should do some experimenting&#8230; or has anyone else experimented with   this?   JM   231/194/204 (10lbs to go)   Atkins since 22 May &#8216;03 </p>
<p>I personally do not believe that carbs are immediately burnt. &nbsp;I think  there may be a variety of uses for them&#44; such as brain food&#44; replacing  glycogen&#44; etc. &nbsp;Certainly burning all of them is possible. &nbsp;But&#44; if this is  true&#44; why do I get a lift of mental energy when I take in some carbs during  a bike ride? &nbsp;I don&#8217;t believe that I get that much of a physical impact&#44;  but there&#8217;s really no way for me to test this. &nbsp;I do feel better&#44; which  could be psychological. &nbsp;Plus&#44; it depends on when the carbs go into your  system &#8212; better is while exercising or before (in terms of being burnt).  &#8212; </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Nothing wrong here. Calories are calories are calories. No magic or physics.  Low carb&#44; and carbs are sugars pure and simple&#44; the fewer carbs you eat the  fewer cals you will consume. Fat and protein &nbsp;make you less likely to binge  or go crazy.  Exercise is the key to ongoing weight loss and maintenance.  I went from 158.5 to 131.5. Need to gain 3.5 pounds&#44; and am pretty close.  Here are my guidelines:  -Fatty foods will increase your LDL  &#8211; Calories count. Want to lose weight? Watch you cals. But carbos make you  hungry&#44; so watch you carbo intake. Less food = fewer cals.  &#8211; replace your bad carbs with good ones. White bread to stone ground bread&#44;  white rice to brown rice&#44; pasta to whole wheat pasta &nbsp;(and not the blends).  -look to lose 1.5 to lbs/week. With diet and exercise you can do this.  Now back to exercise&#44; it is the key..  Rich </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; Hi&#44;   I&#8217;ve got a theory and was wondering if it&#8217;s true or if anyone else has   thought about this before. &nbsp;You may rememember a few weeks ago&#44; I said I   noticed that I could eat many more carbs&#44; since I started exercising &#8212;   and still stay in ketosis.   Well&#44; here&#8217;s my theory&#8230;.   Assuming:   -My treadmill says I just burned 200 calories.   -Carbs are used as fuel before anything else (except alcohol &#8212; but I   had no alcohol.)   -1 gram of carbs works out to 4 calories.   -I just ate something with about 50 grams of carbs in it   Then:   Did I just burn ALL (50&#215;4=200) of those carbs off?   Is there something wrong in my logic? &nbsp;Is that not the way the body works?   If this is true&#44; then could I eat somthing with 100 grams of carbs and   then work out and burn 400 calories and be done with it.   I should do some experimenting&#8230; or has anyone else experimented with  this?   JM   231/194/204 (10lbs to go)   Atkins since 22 May &#8216;03  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Hi&#44;  I&#8217;ve got a theory and was wondering if it&#8217;s true or if anyone else has  thought about this before. &nbsp;You may rememember a few weeks ago&#44; I said I  noticed that I could eat many more carbs&#44; since I started exercising &#8212;  and still stay in ketosis.  Well&#44; here&#8217;s my theory&#8230;.  Assuming:  -My treadmill says I just burned 200 calories.  -Carbs are used as fuel before anything else (except alcohol &#8212; but I  had no alcohol.)  -1 gram of carbs works out to 4 calories.  -I just ate something with about 50 grams of carbs in it  Then:  Did I just burn ALL (50&#215;4=200) of those carbs off?  Is there something wrong in my logic? &nbsp;Is that not the way the body works?  If this is true&#44; then could I eat somthing with 100 grams of carbs and  then work out and burn 400 calories and be done with it.  I should do some experimenting&#8230; or has anyone else experimented with this?  JM  231/194/204 (10lbs to go)  Atkins since 22 May &#8216;03 </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> Exercise is the key to ongoing weight loss and maintenance. </p>
<p>The key to weight loss and maintenance is reduced consumption.  Period. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Consider that carbs won&#8217;t immediately put you out of ketosis. &nbsp;You  need to add about 100g of carbs to your liver glycogen store to drop  out of ketosis&#44; but at the same time you&#8217;re replenishing muscle  glycogen (exercise may deplete muscle glycogen&#44; giving you a larger  &quot;carb sink&quot; on average)&#44; powering ongoing activity&#44; etc etc. &nbsp;It&#8217;s not  just a simple &quot;eat carbs&#44; drop out of ketosis.&quot;  So&#44; while exercise may use up carbs (it depends on the exercise &#8211;  light enough exercise may only burn fat)&#44; it also sets up your body to  be able to absorb more carbs later. &nbsp;Additionally&#44; routine exercise  may increase your base metabolism&#44; allowing other parts of your body  to burn carbs faster too. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>  Hi&#44;   I&#8217;ve got a theory and was wondering if it&#8217;s true or if anyone else has   thought about this before. &nbsp;You may rememember a few weeks ago&#44; I said I   noticed that I could eat many more carbs&#44; since I started exercising &#8212;   and still stay in ketosis.   Well&#44; here&#8217;s my theory&#8230;.   Assuming:   -My treadmill says I just burned 200 calories.   -Carbs are used as fuel before anything else (except alcohol &#8212; but I   had no alcohol.) </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that is exactly right. They will be burned as fuel first&#44;  if there is a demand for them. I think what happens (for a person who  exercises a lot) is that the capacity for storing glycogen is active.  Everytimne you exercise hard&#44; you burn out your glycogen. When you eat  carbs right after exercising hard&#44; or during&#44; or perhaps even before&#44;  the carbs are used to refill the glycogen in your muscles. That glycogen  won&#8217;t be burned first unless you put a load on the system&#44; ie hard  exercise. Otherwise&#44; the body happily continues to get energy direct  from food in the system or from fat&#44; because you aren&#8217;t demanding a lot.   -1 gram of carbs works out to 4 calories.   -I just ate something with about 50 grams of carbs in it   Then:   Did I just burn ALL (50&#215;4=200) of those carbs off?   Is there something wrong in my logic? &nbsp;Is that not the way the body works?   If this is true&#44; then could I eat somthing with 100 grams of carbs and   then work out and burn 400 calories and be done with it.   I should do some experimenting&#8230; or has anyone else experimented with this? </p>
<p>I think you are right.  martin  &#8212;  Wesley Clark for President  www.AmericansForClark.com  Martin Smith </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p> Exercise is the key to ongoing weight loss and maintenance. </p>
<p>No it&#8217;s not. </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Jim&#44;  The calorie counts on the machines bear no relation to reality. I&#8217;ve found  this to be true for myself when logging food and exercise very closely and  have read the same thing in several books including Dr. Bernstein&#8217;s latest  &quot;Diabetes Solution.&quot;  You&#8217;ll have to log what you eat and how much exercise you do (and what the  machine says) for a fw months to determine how the calorie counts on the  machines match up with how your weight loss proceeds. For me the reality of  calories burned is about half what the machine shows&#44; if that.  &#8212; Jenny  168.5/137  Low Carb 9/1998 &#8211; 8/2001 and 11/10/02 &#8211; Now  http://www.geocities.com/jenny_the_bean  How to calculate your need for protein * How much people really lose each  month * &nbsp;Water Weight Gain &amp; Loss * The &quot;Two Gram Cure&quot; for Hunger Cravings  * Characteristics of Successful Dieters * Indispensible Low Carb Treats *  Should You Count that Low Impact Carb? * Curing Ketobreath * Exercise  Starting from Zero * &nbsp;NEW! Do Starch Blockers Work? </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211; Hi&#44;   I&#8217;ve got a theory and was wondering if it&#8217;s true or if anyone else has   thought about this before. &nbsp;You may rememember a few weeks ago&#44; I said I   noticed that I could eat many more carbs&#44; since I started exercising &#8212;   and still stay in ketosis.   Well&#44; here&#8217;s my theory&#8230;.   Assuming:   -My treadmill says I just burned 200 calories.   -Carbs are used as fuel before anything else (except alcohol &#8212; but I   had no alcohol.)   -1 gram of carbs works out to 4 calories.   -I just ate something with about 50 grams of carbs in it   Then:   Did I just burn ALL (50&#215;4=200) of those carbs off?   Is there something wrong in my logic? &nbsp;Is that not the way the body works?   If this is true&#44; then could I eat somthing with 100 grams of carbs and   then work out and burn 400 calories and be done with it.   I should do some experimenting&#8230; or has anyone else experimented with  this?   JM   231/194/204 (10lbs to go)   Atkins since 22 May &#8216;03  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4>
<p>Yes it is. Lazy people cuts their cals and their carbs&#44; and lose some  weight. It never stays off&#44; just look at the research. You must move your  body a few hours a week. Break a sweat&#44; watch your diet&#44; and you will stay  thin.  Rich R. </p>
<p> &#8211; Hide quoted text &#8212; Show quoted text &#8211;  Exercise is the key to ongoing weight loss and maintenance.   No it&#8217;s not.  </p>
</p>
<h4><strong>Response:</strong></h4></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://diabetestalking.com/diabetes-cure/theory-about-carbs-and-exercise-2155050.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

